Trial reportPharmacology research & perspectives2025
Phase I Study of the Safety, Tolerability, and Pharmacokinetics of Inhaled Voriconazole in Healthy Volunteers and Subjects With Stable Asthma.
Trial report in Pharmacology research & perspectives, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04229303 (To Assess Safety, PK of Inhaled Voriconazole), which is not on this map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
To Assess Safety, PK of Inhaled Voriconazole (ZP-059) Single Doses in Healthy Subjects (Part 1), ZP-059 Multiple Doses in Stable Asthma (Part 2) and in a Crossover Trial of ZP-059 and Oral Voriconazole Single Doses in Stable Asthma (Part 3)
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Asthma and Allergic Bronchopulmonary Aspergillosis: Understanding, Insights, and State-of-the-Art.Journal of inflammation research · 2026Review
- Mechanistic insights into voriconazole-exacerbated selpercatinib-induced thrombocytopenia: a pharmacokinetic interaction case report.Frontiers in oncology · 2026Article
- Allergic bronchopulmonary aspergillosis andJournal of thoracic disease · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The aim of this study was to evaluate safety, tolerability, and pharmacokinetics (PK) of single and multiple doses of a novel inhaled formulation of voriconazole (ZP-059). In the single ascending dose part, 4 cohorts of 6 healthy subjects received one dose of inhaled voriconazole (5-40 mg). In the multiple ascending dose part, 3 cohorts of 6 subjects with mild asthma received voriconazole 10 mg twice daily [BID], 20 mg BID or 40 mg once daily. In the 2-period crossover part, 16 subjects with mild to moderate asthma each received one dose of inhaled voriconazole 20 mg and one dose of oral voriconazole 200 mg. A bioanalytical method was developed and validated to simultaneously determine concentrations of voriconazole and its metabolite N-oxide voriconazole in serum and sputum. Inhaled voriconazole was well tolerated with no treatment emergent adverse events (TEAEs) leading to treatment discontinuation. The PK profile of inhaled voriconazole showed rapid absorption, apparent greater than proportional increase in exposure with increasing dose, a consistent half-life across dosing, and large clearance and volume of distribution. Following repeat administration limited accumulation was observed. Systemic exposure following inhaled voriconazole was much lower than following oral voriconazole. Serum data confirmed that voriconazole was extensively metabolized also when administered by inhalation. Sputum data following inhaled voriconazole were limited but demonstrated increasing exposure with increasing dose. The current study shows the newly developed dry powder inhaled formulation of voriconazole to be safe and well tolerated, providing a possible improved treatment approach for patients affected by allergic bronchopulmonary aspergillosis. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov ID: NCT04229303.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.