ReviewMolecular medicine reports2025
Modic changes: From potential molecular mechanisms to future research directions (Review).
Review in Molecular medicine reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Diagnostic Features of Discogenic Low Back Pain: A Narrative Review and Suggested Areas for Future Research and Clinical Practice.JOR spine · 2026Review
- Influence of Modic changes on short-term clinical and patient-reported outcomes after anterior cervical discectomy and fusion: a retrospective cohort study.Frontiers in neurology · 2026Article
- Development of a predictive model for adverse outcomes after unilateral biportal endoscopic spine surgery in the treatment of lumbar disc herniation using six interpretable machine learning models.Frontiers in surgery · 2026Article
- Modic Changes as Biomarkers for Treatment of Chronic Low Back Pain.Biomedicines · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Low back pain (LBP) is a leading cause of disability worldwide. Although not all patients with Modic changes (MCs) experience LBP, MC is often closely associated with LBP and disc degeneration. In clinical practice, the focus is usually on symptoms related to MC, which are hypothesized to be associated with LBP; however, the link between MC and nerve compression remains unclear. In cases of intervertebral disc herniation, nerve compression is often the definitive cause of symptoms. Recent advances have shed light on the pathophysiology of MC, partially elucidating its underlying mechanisms. The pathogenesis of MC involves complex bone marrow‑disc interactions, resulting in bone marrow inflammation and edema. Over time, hematopoietic cells are gradually replaced by adipocytes, ultimately resulting in localized bone marrow sclerosis. This process creates a barrier between the intervertebral disc and the bone marrow, thereby enhancing the stability of the vertebral body. The latest understanding of the pathophysiology of MC suggests that chronic inflammation plays a significant role in its development and hypothesizes that the complement system may contribute to its pathological progression. However, this hypothesis requires further research to be confirmed. The present review we proposed a pathological model based on current research, encompassing the transition from Modic type 1 changes (MC1) to Modic type 2 changes (MC2). It discussed key cellular functions and their alterations in the pathogenesis of MC and outlined potential future research directions to further elucidate its mechanisms. Additionally, it reviewed the current clinical staging and pathogenesis of MC, recommended the development of an updated staging system and explored the prospects of integrating emerging artificial intelligence technologies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.