ArticleMolecular imaging and radionuclide therapy2025
Improved Accuracy and Reliability of PRIMARY Scoring Using Delayed [
Article in Molecular imaging and radionuclide therapy, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT07168616 (Prospective Evaluation of Istanbul PSMA PET/CT Criteria for Selecting Candidates for Active Surveillance in Low-Risk Prostate Cancer), which is not on this map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Prospective Evaluation of Istanbul PSMA PET/CT Criteria for Selecting Candidates for Active Surveillance in Low-Risk Prostate Cancer
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Istanbul PSMA PET/CT criteria (IPPC): an imaging-based approach to patient selection for active surveillance.European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging · 2026Article
- Diagnostic value of PRIMARY score and a combined model with SUVmax in 18F-PSMA-1007 PET/CT for prostate cancer.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objectives: Delayed [ Methods: A total of 140 patients with biopsy results of International Society of Urological Pathology grade groups (ISUP) 1-2 who had standard (median 60 min) and delayed images (median 138 min) with [ Results: The percentage of lesions scored as 1-2 in PRIMARY scoring decreased from 29% to 10% in delayed images compared with standard images, whereas lesions scored as 3-5 increased from 71% to 90%. Additionally, agreement between two experienced nuclear medicine physicians regarding scoring was 66% for standard imaging and 77% for delayed imaging. The number of patients with PRIMARY score 5 increased from 31 to 46 in delayed imaging. All patients were confirmed to have clinically significant prostate cancer (csPCa). Furthermore, no csPCa of ISUP grade 3 or higher was detected in patients with a delayed PRIMARY score (dPRIMARY). The sensitivity of standard PRIMARY scoring was 71%, which increased to 92% with dPRIMARY scoring, with a consistent positive predictive value of 87% for both. Intraobserver agreement Cohen's kappa values for all observers were higher for delayed images than for standard images. Inter-observer agreement, assessed by Fleiss kappa, was 0.47 and 0.52 for standard images in rounds 1 and 2, respectively, and 0.61 and 0.72 for delayed images, respectively. Conclusion: Decreased background activity and increased primary tumor uptake in delayed images improved differentiation between primary tumors and benign lesions, leading to better primary tumor identification. Enhanced reliability was also observed in both intraobserver and interobserver assessments of delayed images.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.