ArticleCurrent computer-aided drug design2026
Network Pharmacology and Experimental Validation to Reveal the Pharmacological Mechanisms of Gynostemma pentaphylla against Acute Pharyngitis.
Article in Current computer-aided drug design, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundAcute pharyngitis (AP) is a prevalent ailment. Gynostemma pentaphylla (GP), a traditional Chinese medicine (TCM), may treat AP due to its anti-tumor and anti-inflammatory properties, but this remains unexplored.
methodsThis study utilized the TCMSP and Swiss Target Prediction databases to analyze GP's chemical composition and target proteins. The Genecards database was used to identify targets relevant to AP. A PPI network diagram of drug-disease intersection targets was created using the STRING database, and Cytoscape was utilized to create a network visualization diagram of "GP active components-targets-AP" in order to determine key active components of GP in treating AP. Gene ontology (GO) and Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes (KEGG) enrichment analyses were conducted on targets in the David database. Molecular docking verification of key targets and components was performed using AutoDock Vina software. In animal experiments, a rat model of AP was induced by a 15% concentrated ammonia solution, and HE staining was conducted to observe histopathological changes in the rat pharynx after intragastric administration of Houyanqing. ELISA was used to detect expression levels of serum interleukin-1-beta (IL-1β), interleukin- 6 (IL-6), and tumor necrosis factor-α (TNF-α). RESULTS AND DISCUSSION: A total of 18 active ingredients were screened from GP, among which Ruvoside _ qt, Rhamnazin, 3 ' -methyleriodictyol, and sitosterol were five key active ingredients. The key targets involved EGFR, STAT3, MAPK3, SRC, AKT1, etc. KEGG enrichment analysis showed that GP mainly acted on Pathways in cancer, P13K-AKT signaling Pathways, JAK-STAT signaling pathways, and other signaling pathways. Molecular docking results showed that four core compounds and five key targets met the energy matching. Animal experiments showed that compared with the normal group, the expression levels of IL-1β, IL-6, and TNF-α in the AP model group were significantly up-regulated (P < 0.05). In addition, compared with the model group, intragastric administration of the dexamethasone group and gypenosides group could alleviate the up-regulation of inflammatory factors in model rats, and the levels of IL-1β, IL-6, and TNF-α were decreased (P < 0.05).
conclusionThis study predicted the possible targets of GP in the treatment of AP through network pharmacology. The results suggest that gypenosides may inhibit the expression of inflammatory factors by regulating Pathways in cancer, P13K-AKT, and signaling pathways to treat AP.
Indexed as
Identifiers
39917932What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.