ArticleDrug testing and analysis2025
Screening and Quantification of the Synthetic Cannabinoid Receptor Agonist 5F-MDMB-PINACA From Seized Prison Paper Using Ultraperformance Liquid Chromatography-Mass Spectrometry Approaches.
Article in Drug testing and analysis, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Interpol review of forensic drug chemistry, 2022-2025.Forensic science international. Synergy · 2026Review
- Study on Phase I Metabolic Processes and Metabolite Biomarker Identification of Synthetic Cannabinoids 5F-ADB-PINACA and 5F-ADBICA in Human Liver Microsomes and Zebrafish Model.Molecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- A Meta-Narrative Review of Channelopathies and Cannabis: Mechanistic, Epidemiologic, and Forensic Insights into Arrhythmia and Sudden Cardiac Death.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025Review
- Screening and Quantification of the Synthetic Cannabinoid Receptor Agonist 5F-MDMB-PINACA From Seized Prison Paper Using Ultraperformance Liquid Chromatography-Mass Spectrometry Approaches.Drug testing and analysis · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Infusing synthetic cannabinoid receptor agonists on paper quickly became a main route for illicit entry into prisons (i.e., mail correspondence) in the last decade. So far, there are limited data on validated detection methods and typical concentration profiles of these substances on paper to inform interventions. An approach to quantify and map the synthetic cannabinoid receptor agonist (SCRA) 5F-MDMB-PINACA on a seized paper sample from a UK Prison was determined using ultraperformance liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry. The seized paper sample was initially screened using ultraperformance liquid chromatography-quadrupole time-of-flight-mass spectrometry that confirmed the presence of 5F-MDMB-PINACA. A quantification method was then optimised and validated for the SCRA using a simple liquid chromatography-quadrupole Dalton-mass spectrometry system. Percentage recovery studies were carried out on paper spiked with 1, 5 and 20 mg/cm
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.