ArticleHuman brain mapping2025
Intermodal Consistency of Whole-Brain Connectivity and Signal Propagation Delays.
Article in Human brain mapping, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- High-resolution electrophysiological mapping of effective connectivity of lateral prefrontal cortex.Brain : a journal of neurology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Measuring propagation of perturbations across the human brain and their transmission delays is critical for network neuroscience, but it is a challenging problem that still requires advancement. Here, we compare results from a recently introduced, noninvasive technique of functional delays estimation from source-reconstructed electro/magnetoencephalography, to the corresponding findings from a large dataset of cortico-cortical evoked potentials estimated from intracerebral stimulations of patients suffering from pharmaco-resistant epilepsies. The two methods yield significantly similar probabilistic connectivity maps and signal propagation delays, in both cases characterized with Pearson correlations greater than 0.5 (when grouping by stimulated parcel is applied for delays). This similarity suggests a correspondence between the mechanisms underpinning the propagation of spontaneously generated scale-free perturbations (i.e., neuronal avalanches observed in resting state activity studied using magnetoencephalography) and the spreading of cortico-cortical evoked potentials. This manuscript provides evidence for the accuracy of the estimate of functional delays obtained noninvasively from reconstructed sources. Conversely, our findings show that estimates obtained from externally induced perturbations in patients capture physiological activities in healthy subjects. In conclusion, this manuscript constitutes a mutual validation between two modalities, broadening their scope of applicability and interpretation. Importantly, the capability to measure delays noninvasively (as per MEG) paves the way for the inclusion of functional delays in personalized large-scale brain models as well as in diagnostic and prognostic algorithms.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.