Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39917724›Full record

ReviewGynecologic oncology reports2025

Challenges and opportunities to address the emerging burden of targeted therapies in ovarian cancer.

Salamatu Abdul-Aziz, Nawaraj Bhattarai, Luke Vale, Gurdeep S Sagoo, Asima Mukhopadhyay

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Gynecologic oncology reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Salamatu Abdul-AzizJames Cook University Hospital, South Tees NHS Foundation Trust, Marton Road, Middlesbrough TS4 3BW, UK.
Nawaraj BhattaraiPopulation Health Sciences Institute, Faculty of Medical Sciences, Baddiley-Clark Building, Newcastle University, Richardson Road, Newcastle NE2 4BN, UK.
Luke ValeGlobal Health Economics Centre, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, 15-17 Tavistock Place, Kings Cross, London WC1H 9SH, UK.
Gurdeep S SagooPopulation Health Sciences Institute, Faculty of Medical Sciences, Baddiley-Clark Building, Newcastle University, Richardson Road, Newcastle NE2 4BN, UK.
Asima MukhopadhyayJames Cook University Hospital, South Tees NHS Foundation Trust, Marton Road, Middlesbrough TS4 3BW, UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Ovarian cancer (OC) poses a significant socio-economic burden globally with the greatest impact observed in low-and-middle income countries (LMIC). Despite the survival benefit from targeted therapies such as bevacizumab and poly (ADP- ribose) polymerase (PARP) inhibitors, they are associated with high costs to patients and payers which widens the disparities between high and low-income countries. OC treatments may also cause significant morbidity from cytoreductive surgery through to the use of targeted therapies reducing quality of life (QoL). Innovative approaches are necessary to address the increasing burden from the cost and morbidity of OC treatment especially in LMIC. De-escalation of treatment without compromising oncological outcomes could be a strategy to reduce financial cost and morbidity. Moreover, de-escalation techniques integrating the knowledge of pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics for dose reduction should be incorporated into clinical trials to identify the minimum effective dose rather than the maximum tolerated with the goal of reducing clinical and financial toxicity. This review summarises the health and economic burden of ovarian cancer with particular reference to LMIC and proposes de-escalation of targeted therapy as a clinical and economic strategy in increasing accessibility and affordability with consideration of patient preferences.

Indexed as

AffordabilityOvarian cancerPARP inhibitorsPatient preferencesQuality of lifeWillingness to pay

Identifiers

PMID39917724
PMCPMC11800098

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.