ArticleFrontiers in dental medicine2024
Effect of double adhesive layer application on micro-tensile dentin bond strength of a universal adhesive.
Article in Frontiers in dental medicine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed.
- Microtensile bond strength and dentin-adhesive interface of universal adhesives before and after artificial aging: an in vitro study.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Influence of film thickness of one and two-step universal adhesives on dentin bond strength.BMC oral health · 2026Article
- The impact of three desensitizing materials on the shear strength between composite resin and dentin: an in-vitro study.BMC oral health · 2025Article
- Micro-Tensile Bond Strength of a Mesoporous Bioactive Glass-Containing Universal Adhesive: An In Vitro Study on the Effects of Artificial Aging.Materials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- The Influence of Drying Time, Application Mode, and Agitation on the Dentin Bond Strength of a Novel Mesoporous Bioactive Glass-Containing Universal Dentin Adhesive.Journal of functional biomaterials · 2025Article
- Comparative evaluation of chlorhexidine and benzalkonium chloride pretreatments on bond strength durability of immediate dentin sealing with universal adhesive: an in vitro study.BMC oral health · 2025Article
- Preservation Strategies for Interfacial Integrity in Restorative Dentistry: A Non-Comprehensive Literature Review.Journal of functional biomaterials · 2025Review
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Achieving optimal dentin bond strength is crucial for the long-term success of adhesive restorations. This study aims to evaluate the impact of double adhesive layer application, with and without light curing between applications, on the micro-tensile dentin bond strength (µ-TBS) of a universal adhesive, in comparison to the conventional single-layer application. Methods: Intact human molars were divided into three groups ( Results: The double adhesive layer with and without light curing between layers showed similar μ-TBS to that of the control group ( Discussion: From a clinical perspective, these findings suggest that the accurate application of a single layer of a universal adhesive can be as effective as more complex techniques. Additionally, the use of universal bonding agents may have contributed to the outcomes observed in this study. In conclusion, double adhesive layer application and light curing between adhesive layers did not increase the µ-TBS with the universal adhesive agent explored.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.