Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39917602›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in plant science2024

Combining genotyping approaches improves resolution for association mapping: a case study in tropical maize under water stress conditions.

Fernanda Carla Ferreira de Pontes, Ingrid Pinheiro Machado, Maria Valnice de Souza Silveira, Antônio Lucas Aguiar Lobo, Felipe Sabadin, Roberto Fritsche-Neto, Júlio César DoVale

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in plant science, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Fernanda Carla Ferreira de PontesPostgraduate Program of Plant Science, Federal University of Ceará, Fortaleza, Ceará, Brazil.
Ingrid Pinheiro MachadoPostgraduate Program of Plant Science, Federal University of Ceará, Fortaleza, Ceará, Brazil.
Maria Valnice de Souza SilveiraPostgraduate Program of Plant Science, Federal University of Ceará, Fortaleza, Ceará, Brazil.
Antônio Lucas Aguiar LoboPostgraduate Program of Plant Science, Federal University of Ceará, Fortaleza, Ceará, Brazil.
Felipe SabadinCollege of Agriculture and Applied Sciences, Utah State University, Logan, UT, United States.
Roberto Fritsche-NetoLouisiana State University Agricultural Center, Baton Rouge, LA, United States.
Júlio César DoValePostgraduate Program of Plant Science, Federal University of Ceará, Fortaleza, Ceará, Brazil.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Genome-wide Association Studies (GWAS) identify genome variations related to specific phenotypes using Single Nucleotide Polymorphism (SNP) markers. Genotyping platforms like SNP-Array or sequencing-based techniques (GBS) can genotype samples with many SNPs. These approaches may bias tropical maize analyses due to reliance on the temperate line B73 as the reference genome. An alternative is a simulated genome called "Mock," adapted to the population using bioinformatics. Recent studies show SNP-Array, GBS, and Mock yield similar results for population structure, heterotic groups definition, tester selection, and genomic hybrid prediction. However, no studies have examined the results generated by these different genotyping approaches for GWAS. This study aims to test the equivalence among the three genotyping scenarios in identifying significant effect genes in GWAS. To achieve this, maize was used as the model species, where SNP-Array genotyped 360 inbred lines from a public panel via the Affymetrix platform and GBS. The GBS data were used to perform SNP calling using the temperate inbred line B73 as the reference genome (GBS-B73) and a simulated genome "Mock" obtained

Indexed as

candidate genesgenes with similar functionsgenotyping by sequencinggenotyping platformsGWASsimulated genomeSNP-array

Identifiers

PMID39917602
PMCPMC11798985

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.