ArticleFrontiers in plant science2024
Deep application of controlled-release urea increases the yield and saponin content of
Article in Frontiers in plant science, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Controlled-release potassium sulfate combined with the deep banding method on soybean productivity and soil microbial characteristics.Frontiers in plant science · 2026Article
- Integrating the Nano-Phyto-Micro Triad for Climate-Resilient and Sustainable Agriculture.ACS omega · 2025Review
- Controlled-release fertilizers increase sunflower yield by regulating soil nitrogen, photosynthesis, and root structure in arid regions.Frontiers in plant science · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: The deep application of controlled-release urea (CRU) offers potential advantages for crops with extended growth periods. However, its effects on Methods: In this study, we conducted a two-year field plot experiment to investigate the effect of CRU on Results: Our results indicated that yields increased by 27.1-37.6% with R0, R6, R12, and R6B, while remaining stable with R6R compared to CK. Simultaneously, the total saponin content in the roots of R6, R6B, and R6R was improved by 14.3-38.1%, compared to CK. The distribution depth of soil NO Conclusion: This study identifies that the deep application of CRU at a depth of 6 cm has the potential to enhance both yield and quality of
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.