Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39917586›Full record

ArticleBJUI compass2025

Retzius-sparing radical prosatectomy: First 200 Australian cases.

Troy Richard John Gianduzzo, Philip Ellard Dundee

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BJUI compass, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Troy Richard John GianduzzoThe Wesley Hospital Brisbane Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9683-3175
Philip Ellard DundeeThe University of Queensland Brisbane Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8581-5051

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objectives: The objective of this study is to report the first multi-centred Australian series of 200 cases of Retzius-sparing radical prostatectomy (RSRP). Patients and methods: Between April 2017 and June 2024, 200 RSRP procedures (197 robotic, three laparoscopic) were performed separately by the authors in five centres across two Australian cities (Melbourne, Victoria and Brisbane, Queensland). Data were collected prospectively with ethics committee approval (UCH-HREC 2019.01.279) at weeks 1, 4-6, and three-monthly. Exclusion criteria included prostate size >80 cc, significant middle lobe, large anterior tumour, previous TURP or any clinical factor deemed to make RSRP unsuitable. These criteria were relaxed as experience was gained. Results: Median (interquartile range) age, body mass index and PSA were 65 (60-70) years, 26 (25-29) kg/m Conclusion: RSRP provides excellent early continence and can be introduced safely with good oncological results by experienced minimally- invasive surgeons.

Indexed as

functional recoveryprostate cancerradical prostatectomyRetzius‐sparingroboticsurinary continence

Identifiers

PMID39917586
PMCPMC11794102

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.