Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39917521›Full record

Observational studyFrontiers in public health2024

Intensive smoking cessation intervention in a nature-based setting: a feasibility study of the Danish gold standard program.

Mie Sylow Liljendahl, Sanne Staal, Hanne Tønnesen

Abstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in Frontiers in public health, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Mie Sylow LiljendahlClinical Health Promotion Centre, WHO-CC, Parker Institute, Bispebjerg and Frederiksberg Hospital, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Sanne StaalCenter for Health Promotion, Holstebro Kommune, Holstebro, Denmark.
Hanne TønnesenClinical Health Promotion Centre, WHO-CC, Parker Institute, Bispebjerg and Frederiksberg Hospital, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The implementation of nature-based interventions has demonstrated a positive impact on health outcomes and overall wellbeing. The knowledge of nature-based smoking cessation interventions is sparse but might offer potential benefits for smokers undertaking an intensive smoking cessation program. This study assessed the feasibility in real life of the 6-week Danish Intensive Gold Standard Program (GSP) for smoking cessation in nature compared to the standard setting in primary healthcare. This feasibility study followed up with 81 out of 90 (90%) participants in a nature-based setting and 56,480 out of 58,772 (96%) participants in a standard setting. All participants received the intensive GSP and were registered after providing informed consent in the national Danish STOPbase between 2018 and 2023. Feasibility was assessed using the following indicators: primarily successful quitting after 6 months, secondarily at the end of the 6-week program, as well as compliance and satisfaction-all obtained through interviews. All indicators were similarly high in both settings. After 6 months, 43% had successfully quit in the nature-based setting and 37% in the standardized setting without statistical significance (RR 1.25, 95% CI: 0.80-1.94). The nature-based setting was feasible and appeared to produce similar outcomes as the standard setting for the 6-week intensive GSP in Denmark in real life.

Indexed as

Relaxation TherapySmokingSmoking CessationAdultDenmarkFeasibility StudiesFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPatient CompliancePatient SatisfactionPrimary Health CareProgram EvaluationTreatment Outcomefeasibility studiesgold standard programintensive smoking cessation interventionnational databasenature-based intervention

Identifiers

PMID39917521
PMCPMC11799267

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.