ArticleIndian journal of hematology & blood transfusion : an official journal of Indian Society of Hematology and Blood Transfusion2025
Evaluation of Clinical and Hematological Findings of Patients with Acute and Reactivated EBV Infection.
Article in Indian journal of hematology & blood transfusion : an official journal of Indian Society of Hematology and Blood Transfusion, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) is a latent DNA virus that infects B lymphocytes, can cause widespread hematological findings, and can cause various disease manifestations. In our study, it was aimed to the clinical and hematological findings of those in the pediatric age group patients with a primary EBV infection and those with EBV reactivation. The files of the patients whose EBV serology was evaluated and followed up with the diagnosis of EBV. Patient parameters such as age, sex, clinical complaints, physical examination findings, hematologic and biochemical parameters were compared between the primary infection and reactivation groups. Of the 2200 screened patients, 204 were included in the study as EBV primary infection and 117 as EBV reactivation. Concurrent hematological findings were present in 91.1% of patients with EBV primary infection and in 90.6% of patients with reactivation. The rate of lymphocytosis in blood tests and peripheral smears in the primary infection group was significantly higher than in the reactivation group (
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.