Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39917426›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in allergy2024

Thymus and activation-regulated chemokine (CCL17) as a clinical biomarker in atopic dermatitis: significance and limitations in the new treatment era.

Yoko Kataoka

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in allergy, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Yoko KataokaDepartment of Dermatology, Osaka Habikino Medical Center, Habikino, Osaka, Japan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Thymus and activation-regulated chemokine (TARC; CCL17) is a T-helper-2 chemokine that reflects atopic dermatitis (AD) disease activity. Since 2008, serum TARC levels have been commercially measured in Japan, and clinical experience has shown the usefulness of TARC. The fallacy that eczema is always visible often hinders successful treatment, when there is subclinical inflammation which is inferable from the TARC level. AD treatment has entered a new era with higher therapeutic efficacy. TARC has a different meaning than it did previously, and its significance and limitations are discussed. First, a more appropriate topical therapy monitoring TARC would be useful in selecting truly necessitated patients for expensive new therapies. Dupilumab quickly lowers serum TARC before clinical improvement, and its normalization is not a criterion for dose reduction. However, in some severe cases, TARC may help determine whether to continue treatment. During treatment with JAK inhibitors, serum TARC levels are often elevated and may be abnormally high, leading to the exacerbation of dermatitis. Prurigo nodularis is divided into two types associated with elevated and normal TARC levels, which may aid in the selection of therapeutic agents. In this new era, TARC remains a useful biomarker for more accurate drug selection and the determination of therapeutic efficacy; Currently, in clinical trials of AD, all outcome measurements depend on the clinical score; however the use of a biomarker, such as TARC, as a secondary outcome measure will clarify the characteristics of each drug and the pathophysiological conditions for which it is expected to be effective.

Indexed as

atopic dermatitisbiologicsJAK inhibitorsmonitoring biomarkerthymus and activation-regulated chemokinetopical corticosteroid

Identifiers

PMID39917426
PMCPMC11799291

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.