ArticleTurkish journal of surgery2024
Ocular and the whole body radiation exposure during endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography.
Article in Turkish journal of surgery, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objectives: This study aimed to analyze the average whole body radiation exposure, which changes significantly according to during endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) difficulty and to determine whether an ocular protection device must be used by analyzing applied ocular radiation. Material and Methods: Patients >18 years of age in whom an ERCP had been indicated were prospectively included in the study. Results: A total of 1173 patients were included. Increased applied radiation dose significantly correlated with increased shot rate (Rho= 0.789, p <0.001), ERCP duration (Rho= 0.487, p <0.001), cost (Rho= 0.129, p <0.001), and LOS (Rho= 0.109, p <0.001). The whole body, skin, and eye radiation exposure doses were found to be lower than the recommended limit per year (20 mSv/year). Conclusion: Limit of ocular radiation exposure during ERCP did not exceed the recommended annual limit (20 mSv/year), and it was also detected to be much lower than that. Therefore, the use of ocular visors is not recommended.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.