Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39917390›Full record

ArticleFood & nutrition research2023

Evaluation and prioritization of food environment policies in Norway using the Healthy Food Environment Policy Index (Food-EPI).

Liv Elin Torheim, Anne Lene Løvhaug, Camilla Sanne Huseby, Sigrun Henjum, Laura Terragni, Maartje Poelman, Janas Harrington, Stefanie Vandevijvere, Gun Roos, PEN consortium

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Food & nutrition research, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Liv Elin TorheimDepartment of Nursing and Health Promotion, OsloMet - Oslo Metropolitan University.
Anne Lene LøvhaugDepartment of Nursing and Health Promotion, OsloMet - Oslo Metropolitan University.
Camilla Sanne HusebyDepartment of Nursing and Health Promotion, OsloMet - Oslo Metropolitan University.
Sigrun HenjumDepartment of Nursing and Health Promotion, OsloMet - Oslo Metropolitan University.
Laura TerragniDepartment of Nursing and Health Promotion, OsloMet - Oslo Metropolitan University.
Maartje PoelmanChair group Consumption and Healthy Lifestyles, Wageningen University, Wageningen, The Netherlands.
Janas HarringtonHRB Centre for Health and Diet Research, School of Public Health, University College Cork, Ireland.
Stefanie VandevijvereSciensano, Department of epidemiology and public health, Brussel, Belgium.
Gun RoosConsumption Research Norway - SIFO, OsloMet - Oslo Metropolitan University.
PEN consortium

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Government policies promoting healthier food environments can contribute to healthier diets and prevent obesity and diet-related non-communicable diseases. Objective: To assess the level of implementation of internationally recommended food environment policies in Norway and establish prioritised actions to create healthier food environments. Design: The Healthy Food Environment Policy Index (Food-EPI) was adapted to the Norwegian context. It comprised 45 good practice indicators of government food environment policy and infrastructure support. Systematically compiled evidence of relevant policies was verified by government officials and formed the basis for assessing the level of implementation of these policies compared against international best practice benchmarks. The assessment was done by a national non-government expert panel ( Results: Most indicators were rated at a medium or high degree of implementation in both the policy action (69%) and the infrastructure support (77%) components. No indicators were rated as having 'none or very little implementation'. Among the 14 recommended policy actions, active use of price regulation to increase the price of unhealthy foods and decrease the price of healthy foods was the highest priority. Other top priorities were ensuring healthy food environments in public settings and introducing free school meals. Demonstrating knowledge-based and coherent political leadership in public health nutrition policies was the highest priority among the 11 recommended infrastructure support actions. Conclusion: The overall policies in Norway to promote a healthy diet show a medium to high level of implementation. This study highlights that there is still room for additional improvements in Norwegian policies and infrastructure support to promote healthy food environments.

Indexed as

benchmarkingfood environmentnon-communicable diseasespolicypublic health

Identifiers

PMID39917390
PMCPMC11801381

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.