SynthesisFrontiers in oncology2024
Prognostic role of prognostic nutritional index in patients with bladder cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Synthesis in Frontiers in oncology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Prognostic Nutritional Index and Cancer Prognostic Outcomes: An Umbrella Review of Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses of Observational Studies.Advances in nutrition (Bethesda, Md.) · 2026Pooled it
- Prognostic value of Prognostic Nutritional Index in cancer: an umbrella review of systematic review and meta-analysis.Frontiers in nutrition · 2025Pooled it
- Post-Treatment NLR and SII Associations with Response and Progression-Free Survival After Neoadjuvant Disitamab Vedotin Plus PD-1 Blockade in Muscle-Invasive Bladder Cancer: A Real-World Cohort Study.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Prognostic Value of the Prognostic Nutritional Index in Patients with Locally Advanced Bladder Cancer Receiving Perioperative Chemotherapy: A Multicenter Real-World Study.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2026Article
- Prognostic Nutritional Index enhances risk stratification and predicts progression-free survival in upper tract urothelial carcinoma.Discover oncology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Aims: An increasing number of studies have explored the prognostic significance of the prognostic nutritional index (PNI) in bladder cancer patients, but the results are inconsistent. This study systematically investigates the prognostic value of baseline PNI in patients with bladder cancer through a meta-analytic approach. Methods: The databases of PubMed, EmBase, and the Cochrane library were systematically searched for eligible studies from inception until April 2024. The prognostic outcomes including overall survival (OS) and recurrence-free survival (RFS). The summary outcomes were calculated using the random-effects model, and the exploratory analyses were performed by sensitivity and subgroup analyses. Results: Twelve retrospective studies involved 2,951 patients with bladder cancer were selected in final analysis. The summary results found low PNI were associated with poor OS (HR: 1.80; 95%CI: 1.54-2.10; Conclusions: This study found a significant association between low PNI and poor prognosis in bladder cancer patients. Further large-scale prospective study should be performed to verify this association, and assess the nutrition interventions for patients with bladder cancer. Systematic review registration: https://inplasy.com/inplasy-2024-8-0020/, identifier INPLASY202480020.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.