ArticleJournal of translational autoimmunity2025
The added value of coupling anti-dsDNA and anti-chromatin antibodies in follow-up monitoring of systemic lupus erythematosus patients.
Article in Journal of translational autoimmunity, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- Biofilm-derived curli and Z-DNA shape anti-DNA antibody responses during Salmonella infections.PLoS pathogens · 2026Article
- Autoantibody and biomarker detection in the follow-up of autoimmune diseases: state of the art and future perspectives.Journal of translational autoimmunity · 2026Review
- A symposium update on the key perspectives in systemic sclerosis and systemic lupus erythematosus.Journal of translational autoimmunity · 2026Review
- Clinical and Immunovirological Characteristics Associated with Cardiovascular Dysautonomia in Long COVID.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Article
- Clinical value of simultaneous detection of anti-dsDNA and anti-chromatin antibodies using a multiplex immunoassay in systemic lupus erythematosus: a 5-year retrospective study.Lupus science & medicine · 2026Article
- A 3D Surface Plot for the Effective Visualization of Specific Serum Antibody Binding Properties.Antibodies (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Potential Biomarkers in Systemic Lupus Erythematosus.JMA journal · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: The autoimmune response to chromatin (Chr) or one of the nucleosome components (double stranded (ds)DNA and histones) is typically associated with the development of systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE). Related autoantibodies (Ab) are heterogeneous and, among them, anti-dsDNA Ab are part of the classification criteria and recommended for monitoring SLE with regards to lupus flares and therapy responses. However, anti-dsDNA Ab biomarker performances are weak; therefore, coupling anti-dsDNA with anti-Chr Ab can be proposed, which is the aim of this study. Methods: In this single center study from 2009 to 2024, 269 SLE patients with follow-up information were retrospectively selected from a population of 646 individuals, including 325 SLE patients, who tested positive for anti-dsDNA and/or anti-Chr Ab (Bioplex 2200™). Bio-clinical information during follow-up were assessed at several time points through medical records in order to explore associations between the anti-dsDNA/Chr Ab profile with disease presentation, and anti-dsDNA/Chr Ab fluctuations with disease activity using clinical SLEDAI-2K, flares requiring specific treatment, and the therapeutic response. Results: At inclusion in the follow-up analysis, corresponding to diagnosis (116/269, 43.1 %) or flare (153/269, 56.9 %), SLE patients were subdivided into three serological groups: the double positive dsDNA/Chr group (DP+, 190/269: 70.6 %), followed by the single positive Chr group (SP-C+, 42/269: 15.6 %), and the single positive dsDNA group (SP-D+, 37/269: 13.8 %). The DP + group, which presented important anti-dsDNA/Ab variations during follow-up, was at risk to develop lupus nephritis (56.8 % versus 2.4 % in SP-C+ and 29.7 % in SP-D+ groups, p < 0.04) and serositis (30 % versus 9.5 % in SP-C+ group, Conclusion: coupling anti-dsDNA with anti-Chr Ab detection at disease initiation/flare allows definition of endotypes, which is useful to follow disease activity, predict lupus nephritis/serositis, and anticipate therapeutic response in the DP + group.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.