Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39917291›Full record

ReviewEuropean journal of anaesthesiology and intensive care2023

Experiences and perspectives of adults on using opioids for pain management in the postoperative period: A scoping review protocol.

Dalia Mohammed Aljohani, Nabat Almalki, Rosalind Adam, Patrice Forget

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in European journal of anaesthesiology and intensive care, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Dalia Mohammed AljohaniFrom the Pain AND Opioids after Surgery (PANDOS) European Society of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care (ESAIC) Research Group (DMA, PF), Epidemiology Group, Institute of Applied Health Sciences, University of Aberdeen, Health Sciences Building, Foresterhill, Aberdeen, UK (DMA, PF), Department of Anesthesia Technology (DMA), Department of Nursing, Prince Sultan Military College of Health Sciences, Dhahran, Saudi Arabia (NA), Academic Primary Care, Institute of Applied Health Sciences, University of Aberdeen (RA), Department of Anaesthesia, Aberdeen Royal Infirmary, NHS Grampian, Aberdeen, UK (PF).
Nabat AlmalkiFrom the Pain AND Opioids after Surgery (PANDOS) European Society of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care (ESAIC) Research Group (DMA, PF), Epidemiology Group, Institute of Applied Health Sciences, University of Aberdeen, Health Sciences Building, Foresterhill, Aberdeen, UK (DMA, PF), Department of Anesthesia Technology (DMA), Department of Nursing, Prince Sultan Military College of Health Sciences, Dhahran, Saudi Arabia (NA), Academic Primary Care, Institute of Applied Health Sciences, University of Aberdeen (RA), Department of Anaesthesia, Aberdeen Royal Infirmary, NHS Grampian, Aberdeen, UK (PF).
Rosalind AdamFrom the Pain AND Opioids after Surgery (PANDOS) European Society of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care (ESAIC) Research Group (DMA, PF), Epidemiology Group, Institute of Applied Health Sciences, University of Aberdeen, Health Sciences Building, Foresterhill, Aberdeen, UK (DMA, PF), Department of Anesthesia Technology (DMA), Department of Nursing, Prince Sultan Military College of Health Sciences, Dhahran, Saudi Arabia (NA), Academic Primary Care, Institute of Applied Health Sciences, University of Aberdeen (RA), Department of Anaesthesia, Aberdeen Royal Infirmary, NHS Grampian, Aberdeen, UK (PF).
Patrice ForgetFrom the Pain AND Opioids after Surgery (PANDOS) European Society of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care (ESAIC) Research Group (DMA, PF), Epidemiology Group, Institute of Applied Health Sciences, University of Aberdeen, Health Sciences Building, Foresterhill, Aberdeen, UK (DMA, PF), Department of Anesthesia Technology (DMA), Department of Nursing, Prince Sultan Military College of Health Sciences, Dhahran, Saudi Arabia (NA), Academic Primary Care, Institute of Applied Health Sciences, University of Aberdeen (RA), Department of Anaesthesia, Aberdeen Royal Infirmary, NHS Grampian, Aberdeen, UK (PF).

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo identify and examine the available studies regarding adult perceptions and experiences of postoperative opioid pain management.

introductionThe opioid crisis has been acknowledged as a significant clinical and social problem in many countries. Opioids are often initiated after surgery and may be continued on hospital discharge. There is no consensus on the optimal strategy for integrating patients' views in postoperative opioid prescribing. The aim of this review is to explore the literature on adults' experiences with postoperative opioid pain management. INCLUSION CRITERIA: This review will consider all qualitative studies and mixed-method studies with qualitative approaches that explored adults' opinions or concerns on opioids and/or opioid reduction, and adults' satisfaction with pain control in this context. Participants in the studies should be adults who had undertaken any type of surgery and have had opioid prescriptions for pain management.

methodsThis scoping review will be carried out in accordance with the Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI) methodology and will utilise the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta Analyses extension for scoping reviews (PRISMA-ScR) reporting guideline and checklist. Searches will be conducted in Ovid MEDLINE, PsycInfo, EMBASE and CINAHL (EBSCO). Studies published in the English language will be included with no time limit. The screening and selection of studies will be carried out independently by three reviewers. Then data extraction process will be conducted by the main reviewer and the reviewer's supervisors independently. A descriptive qualitative content analysis will be utilised for data synthesis. The final report will contain a methodological quality assessment, with the findings being presented, including the knowledge gaps and recommendations for research.

Identifiers

PMID39917291
PMCPMC11783630

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.