ReviewJournal of orthopaedic translation2025
Design of internal fixation implants for fracture: A review.
Review in Journal of orthopaedic translation, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Bioresorbable High-Strength HA/PLLA Composites for Internal Fracture Fixation.Molecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Bridging basic science and clinical practice in orthopaedic translational research.Journal of orthopaedic translation · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Internal fixation is the most common and effective fracture treatment, and the design of Internal Fixation Implants (IFI) is important for fracture healing. In recent decades, IFI have been designed from the aspects of materials, geometry, fixation methods and functional characteristics. However, there has been no comprehensive summary on the evaluation method and design methods of IFI. This paper aims to review and analyze the key issues involved in the design of IFI, to provide references for IFI design. Firstly, the main factors affecting the healing effect are summarized and the design requirements of IFI are put forward through the analysis of fracture healing process. Secondly, the evaluation methods of IFI are compared and summarized, and the importance of evaluation methods based on fracture healing theory is emphasized. Subsequently, the properties and application scopes of common biomaterials for IFI are introduced. And the IFI, which is used widely, such as bone plate, intramedullary nail and embracing device, are summed up from the aspects of design factors and design methods. Highlight the distinctive contributions of additive manufacturing for the fabrication of implants and surface treatment for improving the multifunctionality of implants. Finally, the design concept of ideal IFI and the potential research content in the future are proposed based on the design requirements and the summary of the existing design studies. The translational potential of this article: This study summarizes and analyzes the key issues involved in the design of IFI, which provide references for IFI design. A discussion on future research directions and suggestion were made, which is expected to advance the research in this field.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.