ArticleFrontiers in microbiology2024
The clinical prediction model to distinguish between colonization and infection by
Article in Frontiers in microbiology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Precision Approaches to Carbapenem-Resistant Infections in the ICU: Integrating Diagnostics, Stewardship, and Novel Therapies.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Clearance of multiple antibiotic-resistant coagulase-negative staphylococci is selectively associated with higher circulating α-melanocyte stimulating hormone in patients evaluated for chronic inflammatory response syndrome.Frontiers in endocrinology · 2026Observational
- Development and diagnostic performance of a sensitive multiplex pneumonia pathogen identification assay for emergency department patients with pneumonia.Microbiology spectrum · 2025Article
- Clinical characteristics, risk factors and prognosis ofFrontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: To develop a machine learning-based prediction model to assist clinicians in accurately determining whether the detection of Research methods: A retrospective analysis was conducted on 8,318 patients with KP cultures admitted to a tertiary hospital in Northeast China from January 2019 to December 2023. After excluding duplicates, other specimen types, cases with substandard specimen quality, and mixed infections, 286 cases with sputum cultures yielding only KP were included, comprising 67 cases in the colonization group and 219 cases in the infection group. Antimicrobial susceptibility testing was performed on the included strains, and through univariate logistic regression analysis, 15 key influencing factors were identified, including: age > 62 years, ESBL, CRKP, number of positive sputum cultures for KP, history of tracheostomy, use of mechanical ventilation for >96 h, indwelling gastric tube, history of craniotomy, recent local glucocorticoid application, altered consciousness, bedridden state, diagnosed with respiratory infectious disease upon admission, electrolyte disorder, hypoalbuminemia, and admission to ICU (all Results: Antimicrobial susceptibility testing indicated that the resistance rates for penicillins, cephalosporins, carbapenems, and quinolones were significantly higher in the infection group compared to the colonization group (all Conclusion: The Random Forest model effectively distinguishes between infection and colonization status of KP, while the Nomogram visually presents the predictive value of various factors, providing clinicians with a reference for formulating treatment plans. In the future, the accuracy of infection diagnosis can be further enhanced through artificial intelligence technology to optimize treatment strategies, thereby improving patient prognosis and reducing healthcare burdens.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.