Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39917246›Full record

ArticleBioinformation2024

Comparison of orthodontic clear aligners and fixed appliances for anterior teeth retraction using finite element analysis.

Chethan Thimmaiah, Geetika Tomer, Raghu Devanna, Aseem Sharma, Tanushree Sharma, Antara Majumdar, Abhaya Chandra Das

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Bioinformation, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Observational
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Chethan ThimmaiahMDS, Orthodontist, Private Practitioner, #1085, 2nd Main road, Vivekanada nagar, Mysore-23, Karnataka, India.
Geetika TomerProfessor, Department of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics, Faculty of Dental Sciences, SGT University, Gurugram, Haryana, India.
Raghu DevannaReader, Department of Orthodontics, KIMS Dental College and Hospital, KIMS Research Foundation, Amalapuram-533201, East Godavari District, Andra Pradesh, India.
Aseem SharmaReader/Associate Professor, Department of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics, HIDS, Paonta Sahib, Himachal Pradesh, India.
Tanushree SharmaAssistant Professor, Department of Dentistry, Shri Mata Vaishno Devi Institute of Medical Excellence (Medical College & Associated Hospital, SMVDNSH), Kakryal, Jammu and Kashmir, India.
Antara MajumdarIntern, Kalinga Institute of Dental Sciences, KIIT University, Bhubaneswar, Odisha, India.
Abhaya Chandra DasDepartment of Periodontics and Oral Implantology, Institute of Dental Sciences, Siksha 'O' Anusandhan (Deemed to be University), Khandagiri Square, Bhubaneswar - 751030 Odisha, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Orthodontic clear aligners are utilised in order to correct mal-positioned teeth. The comparative effectiveness of transparent aligners and fixed appliance therapy using finite analysis has not been thoroughly studied. Therefore, it is of interest to evaluate the superiority of clear aligners over fixed orthodontic therapy in anterior tooth retraction using finite element analysis (FEA). A maxillary dentition lacking 1stpremolars and with periodontal ligaments was represented by 3D digital models. A transparent aligner, brackets and archwire were produced in a 3D printed lingual retractor. Five distinct models of clear aligners for maxillary anterior internal retraction were designed and created as part of the study: Model M0-Control, Model M1-Posterior Micro-implant, Model M2-Anterior Micro-implant, Model M3-Palatal Plate, Model M4-Enhanced structure and Model A0- Fixed Appliance. The study result has shown that the crown-root of the central incisor's sagittal displacement varied least in the improved clear aligner Model M 3. Nonetheless, noticeable differences in the patterns of tooth movement were noted between the fixed appliance model and the clear aligner models. The teeth's movement pattern stayed the same in the clear aligner models. Compared to transparent aligner types, the fixed appliance shown greater anterior torque control and improved safety for the posterior anchorage teeth. It has been demonstrated that clear aligners are non-invasive, aesthetically acceptable and effective treatment modality.

Indexed as

Anterior teethapplianceclear alignerenhanced structurefinite element analysistorque

Identifiers

PMID39917246
PMCPMC11795490

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.