ArticleBioinformation2024
Comparison of orthodontic clear aligners and fixed appliances for anterior teeth retraction using finite element analysis.
Article in Bioinformation, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Biomechanical analysis of retracting maxillary incisors using clear aligners with palatal mini-implants in extraction cases: a finite-element analysis.BMC oral health · 2026Article
- The Role of Orthodontic Treatment in Preparing the Potential Implant Prosthetic Space for Implant-Supported Single-Tooth Restorations.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2026Observational
- Evaluating pain perception caused by conventional fixed orthodontic treatment and aligners: A comparative study.Bioinformation · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Orthodontic clear aligners are utilised in order to correct mal-positioned teeth. The comparative effectiveness of transparent aligners and fixed appliance therapy using finite analysis has not been thoroughly studied. Therefore, it is of interest to evaluate the superiority of clear aligners over fixed orthodontic therapy in anterior tooth retraction using finite element analysis (FEA). A maxillary dentition lacking 1stpremolars and with periodontal ligaments was represented by 3D digital models. A transparent aligner, brackets and archwire were produced in a 3D printed lingual retractor. Five distinct models of clear aligners for maxillary anterior internal retraction were designed and created as part of the study: Model M0-Control, Model M1-Posterior Micro-implant, Model M2-Anterior Micro-implant, Model M3-Palatal Plate, Model M4-Enhanced structure and Model A0- Fixed Appliance. The study result has shown that the crown-root of the central incisor's sagittal displacement varied least in the improved clear aligner Model M 3. Nonetheless, noticeable differences in the patterns of tooth movement were noted between the fixed appliance model and the clear aligner models. The teeth's movement pattern stayed the same in the clear aligner models. Compared to transparent aligner types, the fixed appliance shown greater anterior torque control and improved safety for the posterior anchorage teeth. It has been demonstrated that clear aligners are non-invasive, aesthetically acceptable and effective treatment modality.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.