ArticleBioinformation2024
An
Article in Bioinformation, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
A fluid-resistant seal must be created for a root canal (RC) treatment to be successful and this is typically accomplished by combining gutta-percha with an RC sealer. The push-out bond strength test is used to evaluate the root canal sealer's effectiveness. Therefore, it is of interest to estimate the push out bond strength of dissimilar root canal sealers.40 human premolar teeth were chosen, and after root canal preparation, 10 samples of each of the following sealant materials were used during obturation using gutta-percha cones: Group I: BIO-C ION + sealer; Group II: AH Plus; Group III: Bioceramic sealer (Sure Seal Root); and Group IV: -MTA-Fillapex. After that, the samples were sectioned into coronal, middle and apical parts by transverse sectioning. A universal testing machine was used to evaluate the push out bond strength (UTM). ANOVA was used to do statistical analysis on the collected data. Compared to the three other sealers, BIO-C ION PLUS sealer's push out bond strength (POBS) was noticeably stronger. The results of this investigation might help clinicians to choose an appropriate endodontic sealer.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.