ArticleBioinformation2024
Evaluation of risk factors, clinic pathological aspects and implant characteristics in patients of oral peri-implant malignancies.
Article in Bioinformation, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Peri-implantitis as a potential risk factor for peri-implant oral malignancy.Journal of the Korean Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This study was conducted to carry out retrospective analyses of oral peri-implant malignancy (OPIM) focussing on demographic details, risk factors, habit factors, clinicopathological features and implant features in patient with OPIM. Clinical data and demographic data from 1646 individuals with oral cancer undergoing resection procedures were gathered. Clinical, radiological, histopathological assessments and implant characteristics records of these patients were obtained and assessed. 46 (2.79%) cases were found to diagnose with OPIM. 36 (85.76%) cases of OPIM were found to having implant occlusion with opposing prosthesis. Prosthesis/prosthesis occlusion was observed in 18 (50%) cases, prosthesis/inlay occlusion in 4 (11.12%) cases and prosthesis/prosthesis on implants in 14 (38.88%) cases. The surgical placement of implants and the galvanic currents that flow between prostheses can operate as an irritating or inflammatory cofactor that aids in the development of malignancies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.