ArticleJournal of applied crystallography2025
Intensity corrections for grazing-incidence X-ray diffraction of thin films using static area detectors.
Article in Journal of applied crystallography, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Origin and application of the Lorentz factor in X-ray diffraction.Acta crystallographica. Section A, Foundations and advances · 2026Article
- 3D electron diffraction-the missing slice completing nanoscale analysis of organic solar cells in TEM.Nature communications · 2026Article
- Article
- A systematic approach for quantitative orientation and phase fraction analysis of thin films through grazing-incidence X-ray diffraction.Journal of applied crystallography · 2025Article
- Identifying Structure and Texture of Metal-Organic Framework CuCrystal growth & design · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Grazing-incidence X-ray diffraction (GIXD) is the technique of choice for obtaining crystallographic information from thin films. An essential step in the evaluation of GIXD data is the extraction of peak intensities, as they are directly linked to the positions of individual atoms within the crystal unit cell. In order to obtain reliable intensities independent of the experimental setup, a variety of correction factors need to be applied to measured GIXD raw data. These include the polarization of the incident beam, solid-angle variations, absorption effects, the transmission coefficient and the Lorentz correction. The aim of this work is to provide a systematic compilation of these intensity corrections required for state-of-the-art GIXD setups with static area detectors. In a first step, analytical formulae are derived on the basis of theoretical considerations. The obtained intensity corrections are then applied to measured GIXD raw data from samples with different textures, including a single crystal and thin films containing either randomly distributed or oriented crystallites. By taking advantage of the symmetries inherent in the different types of textures, integrated peak intensities are determined, and these are compared with intensities calculated from single-crystal diffraction data from the literature. Accurate intensity corrections promise an improved quality of crystal structure solution from thin films and contribute to achieving accurate phase and texture quantifications from GIXD measurements.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.