ArticleFrontiers in genetics2024
Transgenerational epigenetic heritability for growth, body composition, and reproductive traits in Landrace pigs.
Article in Frontiers in genetics, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Sharing approaches in predictive genomics across animals, plants and humans.Nature genetics · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Epigenetics is an important source of variation in complex traits that is not due to changes in DNA sequences, and is dependent on the environment the individuals are exposed to. Therefore, we aimed to estimate transgenerational epigenetic heritability, percentage of resetting epigenetic marks, genetic parameters, and predicting breeding values using genetic and epigenetic models for growth, body composition, and reproductive traits in Landrace pigs using routinely recorded datasets. Birth and weaning weight, backfat thickness, total number of piglets born, and number of piglets born alive (BW, WW, BF, TNB, and NBA, respectively) were investigated. Models including epigenetic effects had a similar or better fit than solely genetic models. Including genomic information in epigenetic models resulted in large changes in the variance component estimates. Transgenerational epigenetic heritability estimates ranged between 0.042 (NBA) to 0.336 (BF). The reset coefficient estimates for epigenetic marks were between 80% and 90%. Heritability estimates for the direct additive and maternal genetic effects ranged between 0.040 (BW) to 0.502 (BF) and 0.034 (BF) to 0.134 (BW), respectively. Repeatability of the reproductive traits ranged between 0.098 (NBA) to 0.148 (TNB). Prediction accuracies, bias, and dispersion of breeding values ranged between 0.199 (BW) to 0.443 (BF), -0.080 (WW) to 0.034 (NBA), and -0.134 (WW) to 0.131 (TNB), respectively, with no substantial differences between genetic and epigenetic models. Transgenerational epigenetic heritability estimates are moderate for growth and body composition and low for reproductive traits in North American Landrace pigs. Fitting epigenetic effects in genetic models did not impact the prediction of breeding values.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.