ArticleNorth American Spine Society journal2025
Neurological deterioration in an adult patient with split cord malformation following untethering via filum sectioning: Case report.
Article in North American Spine Society journal, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Tethered cord syndrome is commonly caused by thick filum terminale and split cord malformation (SCM), which can coexist. If surgery is necessary, it should address both conditions for complete untethering. Some authors also suggest that resection of the septum should precede filum sectioning. Otherwise, cranial migration of the spinal cord after filum cut may cause further damage at the septum level. However, we found no example in the literature demonstrating any adverse effect if that order was not followed. A 34-year-old woman presented with worsening symptoms, including urinary retention, low back and leg pain after surgery at another center, where the thick filum terminale was cut without addressing a midline fibrous septum splitting the cord. We achieved complete untethering with a second surgery by septum resection. The patient's pain improved, but sphincteric disfunction persisted. Our case supports the opinion that in cases of coexisting SCM and thick filum terminale, complete untethering should be achieved by first septum resection, then filum sectioning, in that particular order.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.