ArticleFrontiers in oncology2025
Pulmonary enteric adenocarcinoma with progression disease after second - line therapy: a case report.
Article in Frontiers in oncology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Commentary: Lung enteric-type adenocarcinoma with gastric metastasis: a rare case report and literature review.Frontiers in immunology · 2025Article
- Case Report: Pulmonary enteric adenocarcinoma harboring KRAS/TP53/APC mutations with contralateral lung metastasis: diagnostic challenges and molecular insights.Frontiers in oncology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Pulmonary enteric adenocarcinoma (PEAC, also known as Enteric-type adenocarcinoma of the lung, lung - ETAC) is a rare subtype of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) that has the same morphological and immunohistochemical characteristics as colorectal adenocarcinoma and requires gastroenteroscopy to rule out lesions of enteric origin. As a rare solid tumor in lung cancer, PEAC has unique clinical outcome, imaging, pathological and molecular characteristics, and poor prognosis. However, the molecular characteristics and therapeutic biomarkers of PEAC are unclear, and its treatment remains challenging. In this case, we describe a 61-year-old man diagnosed with advanced primary PEAC with KRAS mutation. In the case of unknown PD-L1 expression status, first-line treatment was given to lung adenocarcinoma regimen (immunotherapy combined with chemotherapy), progression occurred after 2 cycles, and progression-free survival (PFS) was 1.5 months. Then the second-line XELOX regimen (oxaliplatin combined with capecitabine) was adjusted. The lesions were significantly reduced after 2 and 4 cycles, and the disease progressed again after 6 cycles, with a PFS of 4.5 months. Anlotinib targeted drugs were selected for third-line treatment, but considering the overall poor condition of the patient, the patient himself refused further treatment. Finally, after discharge, the patient went to the local hospital for nutritional support and symptomatic treatment. The results suggest that standard first-line therapies (immunotherapy plus chemotherapy) and colorectal cancer regimens may have a relatively limited impact on survival in KRAS-driver positive advanced PEAC.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.