Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39917170›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in oncology2025

Proof of concept of fully automated adaptive workflow for head and neck radiotherapy treatments with a conventional linear accelerator.

Gaia Muti, Marco M J Felisi, Angelo F Monti, Chiara Carsana, Roberto Pellegrini, Edoardo Salmeri, Mauro Palazzi, Paola E Colombo

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in oncology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Adaptive radiotherapy incident-informed team training: a development and feasibility study.Technical innovations & patient support in radiation oncology · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Gaia MutiMedical Physics Department, Azienda Socio Sanitaria Territoriale Grande Ospedale Metropolitano (ASST GOM) Niguarda, Milano, Italy.
Marco M J FelisiMedical Physics Department, Azienda Socio Sanitaria Territoriale Grande Ospedale Metropolitano (ASST GOM) Niguarda, Milano, Italy.
Angelo F MontiMedical Physics Department, Azienda Socio Sanitaria Territoriale Grande Ospedale Metropolitano (ASST GOM) Niguarda, Milano, Italy.
Chiara CarsanaRadioteraphy Department, ASST GOM Niguarda, Milano, Italy.
Roberto PellegriniElekta AB, Medical Affairs, Stockholm, Sweden.
Edoardo SalmeriElekta AB, Medical Affairs, Stockholm, Sweden.
Mauro PalazziRadioteraphy Department, ASST GOM Niguarda, Milano, Italy.
Paola E ColomboMedical Physics Department, Azienda Socio Sanitaria Territoriale Grande Ospedale Metropolitano (ASST GOM) Niguarda, Milano, Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: The objective of this study is to evaluate the performance of an automatic workflow for head-and-neck (H&N) radiotherapy using a multi-atlas based auto-contouring software and an a-priori multicriteria plan optimization algorithm and implement an adaptive online approach with CBCT images. Two different modalities are investigated, the fluence-to-position (FTP) and the adapt-to-shape (ATS) approach. Materials and methods: Nine patients are used for the multi-atlas database. The organs at risk (OARs) of the H&N district and five additional structures (air, fat, tissue, bone and patient's exterior) subsequently used for the creation of the synthetic CT are auto-contoured with the Elekta ADMIRE Result: The dice of the five HU layer structures range between 0.66 and 0.99. The mCycle auto-planning significantly reduces planning time, from 2 hours to 10 minutes. The radiotherapist deems all plans clinically acceptable, and in the majority of cases the automatic plan is the preference choice. The automatic plans enhance OARs sparing and preserve a good target coverage, this is also confirmed by the PQIs result. Comparing FTP and ATS modes in adaptive radiotherapy, ATS exhibits superior outcomes, mostly in the target coverage. In the FTP techniques target coverage is inadequate and statistically different from the accepted values. In the ATS the results align with the initial approved values. Using the ATS mode the planning time takes around 14 minutes and approximately 20 minutes for the entire treatment. Conclusion: This study contributes to the advancement of automatic and adaptive radiotherapy, demonstrating the potential of an automated workflow in H&N treatments.

Indexed as

adapt to shapeauto-planningCBCTfluence to positionMCOoffline adaptive radiotherapyonline adaptive radiotherapy

Identifiers

PMID39917170
PMCPMC11799547

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.