ArticleFrontiers in oncology2025
The effect of baseline versus early glucocorticoid use on immune checkpoint inhibitor efficacy in patients with advanced NSCLC.
Article in Frontiers in oncology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Impact of immune-related adverse events on treatment outcomes in advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors.Frontiers in immunology · 2026Article
- Glucocorticoid inhibits lung cancer cells proliferation and migration by suppressing smad2/3 activation.Scientific reports · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: This study aims to investigate the specific effects of glucocorticoids (GC) on the efficacy of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs), and whether this effect is influenced by the timing and dosage of GC administration. Changes in the neutrophil percentage and the helper/suppressor T lymphocyte ratio [NEUT %/(CD4+/CD8+)] during GC administration were monitored. Methods: The clinical results of 130 patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) treated with ICIs were analyzed and compared with those of patients who did not use GC. Cox proportional hazards regression model and Logistic regression analysis were used to analyze the factors affecting ORR and PFS, and t test was used to analyze the changes of NEUT %/(CD4 +/CD8 +) during GC use. Results: Multivariate Logistic analysis showed that GC use was associated with a higher ORR in 130 patients treated with ICIs [HR = 3.07,95% CI (1.31-7.21), P = 0.010]. Univariate Cox analysis showed that GC use was not significantly correlated with PFS [HR = 0.926,95% CI (0.603-1.420), P = 0.710]. Patients who used GC during the baseline period of ICIs treatment had a higher ORR than those who used GC at the early stage of ICIs treatment (65.4% vs 30.8%, p = 0.024). Multivariate Cox analysis showed that GC use had longer PFS [HR = 0.37,95% CI (0.17-0.78), p = 0.009]. The timing of GC use was different, and there was a difference in NEUT %/(CD4 +/CD8 +) levels before and after treatment. There was no significant difference in ORR and PFS between GC duration and dose. Conclusion: The use of GC helps to enhance the efficacy of immunotherapy. In particular, GC use during the baseline period leads to higher ORR and PFS, regardless of the dose or duration of GC use. The levels of NEUT %/(CD4+/CD8+) varied depending on the timing of GC administration.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.