ArticleCureus2025
Misconceptions About E-cigarettes Among Healthcare Workers at Primary Health Care Centers in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
Article in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Smoking and Vaping Profiles of Healthcare Workers and Their Knowledge, Attitudes, and Behaviors Regarding Vaping.Florence Nightingale journal of nursing · 2026Article
- Nicotine Dependence and Mental Health Among Syrian University Students: The Role of E-Cigarette Use: A Cross-Sectional Study.Health science reports · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundAs e-cigarettes become increasingly popular, especially among youth, addressing the misinformation surrounding their use is crucial. This study aims to enhance healthcare workers' knowledge of the risks associated with e-cigarettes, ultimately improving patient education and public health outcomes. AIMS AND
objectivesTo assess health workers' awareness of misconceptions surrounding e-cigarette use and the implications of this awareness on their personal use and professional practices Methods: A cross-sectional study was conducted at the primary healthcare centers of Prince Sultan Military Medical City (PSMMC) in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia, to assess healthcare professionals' awareness of e-cigarette misconceptions. Utilizing a convenience sampling technique, the target sample size was 246 participants, and the actual participants were 208, ensuring robust representation. Eligible participants include PSMMC healthcare providers currently working in PHC settings, while those from other departments or institutions will be excluded. Data was collected through a structured online questionnaire covering demographic information, personal e-cigarette usage, awareness of health impacts, addictive potential, and regulations related to e-cigarettes.
resultsThe study included a total of 208 participants, with the majority (150 participants, 72.1%) aged between 25 and 35 years. The group was predominantly male (108 participants, 51.9%) and Saudi nationals (147 participants, 70.7%). Additionally, 108 participants (51.9%) were married, and half were specializing in family medicine. While only 35 (16.8%) personally use e-cigarettes, 124 (59.6%) know someone who does, and social media is the primary information source for 127 (61.06%) participants. A strong majority (185,88.9%) believe e-cigarettes are harmful, and 164 (78.8%) recognize the potential harm to bystanders from e-cigarette aerosol. The views on e-cigarettes being less harmful than traditional cigarettes are mixed, with 64 (30.8%) in agreement, while 136 (65.4%) acknowledge their addictive nature. There is widespread support for regulating e-cigarettes like tobacco products (150, 72.1%) and prohibiting their use for individuals under 18 (164, 78.8%). Statistical analysis shows a significant association between the specialty of family medicine and the belief in the health risks of e-cigarettes (p=0.029), indicating the need for targeted education and policy measures.
conclusionDespite participants' relatively good knowledge of e-cigarettes and their health implications, a significant number of misconceptions persist. This highlights the need for ongoing education and training programs tailored for healthcare professionals to address gaps in understanding and ensure they are equipped with accurate information.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.