Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39917144›Full record

ReviewCureus2025

Comparative Efficacy of Brolucizumab and Aflibercept in Polypoidal Choroidal Vasculopathy: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Manar H Allehyani, Abdullah K Alsaeedi, Reem O Alqthmi, Raghad E Saleh, Rawan S Alsamli, Hussam A Almalki, Abdulrahman F Alshehri, Saja A Felimban, Gufran J Kambiji, Mohammad I Almatrafi and 1 more

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Manar H AllehyaniGeneral Surgery, King Abdulaziz Hospital, Makkah, SAU.
Abdullah K AlsaeediOphthalmology, Alnoor Specialist Hospital, Makkah, SAU.
Reem O AlqthmiNeurology, King Abdulaziz Hospital, Makkah, SAU.
Raghad E SalehMedicine and Surgery, Umm Al-Qura University, Makkah, SAU.
Rawan S AlsamliMedicine and Surgery, Umm Al-Qura University, Makkah, SAU.
Hussam A AlmalkiMedicine, Umm Al-Qura University, Makkah, SAU.
Abdulrahman F AlshehriMedicine and Surgery, Umm Al-Qura University, Makkah, SAU.
Saja A FelimbanMedicine, Umm Al-Qura University, Makkah, SAU.
Gufran J KambijiMedicine and Surgery, Umm Al-Qura University, Makkah, SAU.
Mohammad I AlmatrafiOphthalmology, Alnoor Specialist Hospital, Makkah, SAU.
Basant OthmanOphthalmology, Alnoor Specialist Hospital, Makkah, SAU.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Polypoidal choroidal vasculopathy (PCV) represents a distinct subtype of neovascular age-related macular degeneration (nAMD). PCV is currently managed using intravitreal anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) agents such as brolucizumab and aflibercept. This meta-analysis compares the effectiveness of brolucizumab and aflibercept in PCV patients. We systematically searched four electronic databases to identify eligible studies. Data extraction and pooling were performed utilizing the mean difference (MD) or rate ratio (RR) through the generic inverse variance method, with significance determined by a p-value < 0.05 between intervention subgroups. The generic inverse variance analysis method was applied with the employment of the random-effect model when data were heterogeneous. We retrieved 44 studies, 35 were included in the meta-analysis. The analysis compared the efficacy of aflibercept and brolucizumab in patients with nAMD over 3-6 months and 12 months. For best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA), the MD between aflibercept and brolucizumab were -0.11 versus -0.06 at 3-6 months and -0.11 versus -0.04 at 12 months, with no substantial differences (p = 0.58 and p = 0.08, respectively). Regarding polypoidal regression, RR after aflibercept use was 53% versus 70% for brolucizumab at 3-6 months and 47% versus 61% at 12 months, with no significant differences (p = 0.19 and p = 0.31, respectively). In terms of central retinal thickness (CRT), the MDs for aflibercept versus brolucizumab were -129.03 versus -143.93 at 3-6 months and -129.72 versus -145.32 at 12 months, without significant differences (p = 0.62 for both). For central choroidal thickness (CCT) and central foveal thickness (CFT), no significant differences were found between the two interventions at either time point. However, for central macular thickness, brolucizumab demonstrated superiority over aflibercept at 12 months (MD = -119.29 versus -215.00, p < 0.0001). In conclusion, our meta-analysis comparing aflibercept and brolucizumab in PCV revealed no significant differences in BCVA, polypoidal regression, CRT, CCT, and CFT at 6 or 12 months. Overall, both drugs demonstrated comparable efficacy in managing PCV.

Indexed as

afliberceptbrolucizumabcomparative effectivenessmeta-analysispolypoidal choroidal vasculopathy

Identifiers

PMID39917144
PMCPMC11801107

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.