ReviewCureus2025
Comparative Efficacy of Brolucizumab and Aflibercept in Polypoidal Choroidal Vasculopathy: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
Review in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Prevalence of Polypoidal Choroidal Vasculopathy Beyond Recalcitrant Macular Neovasculopathies in a European AMD Cohort and Therapeutic Response to Brolucizumab.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Article
- Comparison of Three Consecutive Monthly Administrations Between Aflibercept 8 mg and Brolucizumab 6 mg in Polypoidal Choroidal Vasculopathy.Pharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Short-Term Outcomes of Three Consecutive Monthly Loading Administrations of Aflibercept 8 Mg for Treatment-Naïve Exudative Age-Related Macular Degeneration.Pharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Switching to Faricimab for Polypoidal Choroidal Vasculopathy with Real-World Outcomes in Refractory Cases - The FAR-PEARL Study Report 1.Clinical ophthalmology (Auckland, N.Z.) · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Polypoidal choroidal vasculopathy (PCV) represents a distinct subtype of neovascular age-related macular degeneration (nAMD). PCV is currently managed using intravitreal anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) agents such as brolucizumab and aflibercept. This meta-analysis compares the effectiveness of brolucizumab and aflibercept in PCV patients. We systematically searched four electronic databases to identify eligible studies. Data extraction and pooling were performed utilizing the mean difference (MD) or rate ratio (RR) through the generic inverse variance method, with significance determined by a p-value < 0.05 between intervention subgroups. The generic inverse variance analysis method was applied with the employment of the random-effect model when data were heterogeneous. We retrieved 44 studies, 35 were included in the meta-analysis. The analysis compared the efficacy of aflibercept and brolucizumab in patients with nAMD over 3-6 months and 12 months. For best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA), the MD between aflibercept and brolucizumab were -0.11 versus -0.06 at 3-6 months and -0.11 versus -0.04 at 12 months, with no substantial differences (p = 0.58 and p = 0.08, respectively). Regarding polypoidal regression, RR after aflibercept use was 53% versus 70% for brolucizumab at 3-6 months and 47% versus 61% at 12 months, with no significant differences (p = 0.19 and p = 0.31, respectively). In terms of central retinal thickness (CRT), the MDs for aflibercept versus brolucizumab were -129.03 versus -143.93 at 3-6 months and -129.72 versus -145.32 at 12 months, without significant differences (p = 0.62 for both). For central choroidal thickness (CCT) and central foveal thickness (CFT), no significant differences were found between the two interventions at either time point. However, for central macular thickness, brolucizumab demonstrated superiority over aflibercept at 12 months (MD = -119.29 versus -215.00, p < 0.0001). In conclusion, our meta-analysis comparing aflibercept and brolucizumab in PCV revealed no significant differences in BCVA, polypoidal regression, CRT, CCT, and CFT at 6 or 12 months. Overall, both drugs demonstrated comparable efficacy in managing PCV.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.