ArticleCureus2025
Mission Impossible: Densah Bur Revolution in Treating Atrophic Maxilla.
Article in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Atrophic maxilla is a condition that compromises the bone density of the jaws. The three-dimensional remodeling of bones makes it more difficult to plan rehabilitation. Bone density plays a key role in implant placement, but in the case of the atrophic maxilla, placement of an implant with conventional burs is difficult and often leads to a failed implant prosthesis. To overcome this complication, Densah burs emerged as a solution for such a challenging situation. In this article, we reported a case of a 55-year-old male patient presented with the posterior atrophic maxilla. Preoperative radiological assessment was done using cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) to evaluate the bone density. Densah bur at an rpm of 700 and a toque of 45 Ncm were used for implant placement. The primary stability of the implants placed using Densah was comparatively higher than that of implants placed using conventional drills. Postoperatively, an orthopantomogram (OPG) was taken to assess the implant position and adjacent bone. The patient was reviewed periodically, healing was satisfactory, and prosthetic rehabilitation was proceeded later.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.