Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39917103›Full record

ArticleCureus2025

Role of Intraoperative Biopsy and Postoperative Upper Gastrointestinal Endoscopy in Patients Undergoing Surgery for Perforated Gastric Ulcer: A Retrospective Study.

Madalena Trindade, Daniel Gomes Pinto, Nuno Carvalho, Carlos Luz

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Madalena TrindadeDepartment of Surgery, Unidade Local de Saúde de Almada-Seixal, Almada, PRT.
Daniel Gomes PintoDepartment of Pathology, Unidade Local de Saúde de Almada-Seixal, Almada, PRT.
Nuno CarvalhoDepartment of Surgery, Unidade Local de Saúde de Almada-Seixal, Almada, PRT.
Carlos LuzDepartment of Surgery, Unidade Local de Saúde de Almada-Seixal, Almada, PRT.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction The intraoperative biopsy of a perforated gastric ulcer is a common practice; however, it may prove to be therapeutically futile, as an upper gastrointestinal endoscopy (UGE) is indicated regardless of the result. Objective To evaluate the histology of the perforated gastric ulcer biopsy (PGUB) and its effect on the subsequent clinical course. Methods A retrospective study (May 2017 to June 2024) of patients diagnosed with perforated gastric ulcer (K251 and K255 - ICD-10), with a review of medical records in the Medical Support System, was conducted. The histology of the PGUB, the performance of UGE, the degree of concordance between the histology of both, and the potential waiver of UGE were evaluated. Informed consent was waived, as this is an observational study without any interference with clinical conduct. Results During the evaluation period, 21 patients underwent PGUB, and 19 patients had a benign histological result; one patient was diagnosed with high-grade non-Hodgkin lymphoma, and one patient had gastric adenocarcinoma. In the following period, 10 patients underwent UGE, and in none of them did the histological diagnosis change. Of the remaining 11 patients who did not undergo UGE, five died, one was lost to follow-up, three are awaiting the procedure, and only two did not undergo the endoscopic exam. Conclusion The intraoperative biopsy of a perforated gastric ulcer is possibly futile, as it does not alter the clinical course. Regardless of the histological result obtained, a UGE is requested.

Indexed as

gastric cancer (gc)gastric ulcer perforationintra-operative biopsyulcer biopsyupper gastrointestinal endoscopy (ogd)

Identifiers

PMID39917103
PMCPMC11801807

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.