ArticleCureus2025
The Use of Glucagon-Like Peptide-1 (GLP-1) Agonists in the Perioperative Period: A Case Study.
Article in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) receptor agonists, initially developed for type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM), have demonstrated efficacy in improving glycemic control and promoting weight loss. However, their use is associated with gastrointestinal side effects, including delayed gastric emptying, which can complicate perioperative care. Current guidelines recommend discontinuing GLP-1 agonists before surgery to reduce risks such as regurgitation and aspiration. Despite these preoperative recommendations, guidance on reintroducing these medications postoperatively is sparse. This case study discusses a 55-year-old woman with diabetes and uterine fibroids who underwent an elective total laparoscopic hysterectomy with bilateral salpingectomy. Following surgery, the patient resumed a GLP-1 agonist on postoperative day one without specific instructions. Ten days later, she presented with symptoms of nausea, vomiting, and abdominal pain, raising concerns for postoperative ileus or small bowel obstruction (SBO). Imaging revealed delayed transit of enteric contrast, initially interpreted as SBO, leading to a scheduled exploratory laparotomy. However, subsequent radiographic findings and clinical improvement led to the cancellation of surgery, with the patient recovering under conservative management. This case highlights the diagnostic challenges in distinguishing between postoperative ileus, SBO, and GLP-1-induced delayed gastric motility. The overlap in symptoms and imaging findings underscores the importance of cautious clinical assessment to avoid unnecessary surgical interventions. Additionally, it raises critical questions about the appropriate timing, dosing, and monitoring of GLP-1 agonists in the postoperative period. The case emphasizes the need for robust guidelines on postoperative GLP-1 agonist management. With the growing use of these medications, further research is necessary to determine optimal strategies for their reintroduction after surgery, balancing the benefits of metabolic control with the risks of gastrointestinal complications.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.