ArticleFrontiers in physiology2025
Comparison and verification of detection accuracy for late deceleration with and without uterine contractions signals using convolutional neural networks.
Article in Frontiers in physiology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Fetal Safety of Intravenous Ferric Carboxymaltose in Pregnancy: A Cardiotocography Study from a Tertiary Care Hospital in Italy.Hematology reports · 2026Article
- Prediction of Neonatal Length of Stay in High-Risk Pregnancies Using Regression-Based Machine Learning on Computerized Cardiotocography Data.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Artificial intelligence-large language models (AI-LLMs) for reliable and accurate cardiotocography (CTG) interpretation in obstetric practice.Computational and structural biotechnology journal · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Cardiotocography (CTG) is used to monitor and evaluate fetal health by recording the fetal heart rate (FHR) and uterine contractions (UC) over time. Among these, the detection of late deceleration (LD), the early marker of fetal mild hypoxemia, is important, and the temporal relationship between FHR and UC is an essential factor in deciphering it. However, there is a problem with UC signals generally tending to have poor signal quality due to defects in installation or obesity in pregnant women. Since obstetricians evaluate potential LD signals only from the FHR signal when the UC signal quality is poor, we hypothesized that LD could be detected by capturing the morphological features of the FHR signal using Artificial Intelligence (AI). Therefore, this study compares models using FHR only (FHR-only model) and FHR with UC (FHR + UC model) constructed using a Convolutional Neural Network (CNN) to examine whether LD could be detected using only the FHR signal. Methods: The data used to construct the CNN model were obtained from the publicly available CTU-UHB database. We used 86 cases with LDs and 440 cases without LDs from the database, confirmed by expert obstetricians. Results: The results showed high accuracy with an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.896 for the FHR-only model and 0.928 for the FHR + UC model. Furthermore, in a validation using 23 cases in which obstetricians judged that the UC signals were poor and the FHR signal had an LD-like morphology, the FHR-only model achieved an AUC of 0.867. Conclusion: This indicates that using only the FHR signal as input to the CNN could detect LDs and potential LDs with high accuracy. These results are expected to improve fetal outcomes by promptly alerting obstetric healthcare providers to signs of nonreassuring fetal status, even when the UC signal quality is poor, and encouraging them to monitor closely and prepare for emergency delivery.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.