ArticleMedEdPORTAL : the journal of teaching and learning resources2025
Integration of Geriatrics and Palliative Medicine Into a Medical Student Clinical Reasoning Curriculum.
Article in MedEdPORTAL : the journal of teaching and learning resources, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Integration of geriatrics and palliative medicine principles into preexisting medical student curricula is imperative to train future physicians to care for older adults and those facing serious illness. Methods: We developed a case of an older adult presenting with a change in mental status within a preexisting small-group case-based interactive clinical reasoning curriculum. The 1-hour and 50-minute session embedded the 4Ms framework (mentation, medications, mobility, and what matters most) in a clinical case to allow students an organic opportunity to apply the 4Ms in practice while using their communication, clinical reasoning, and hypothesis-driven physical examination skills. Students and faculty completed an end-of-session survey, and each small group's differential diagnoses were reviewed. Results: Seventy-five second-year students and 26 faculty participated in the session. On retrospective pre-post surveys, student confidence in all the learning objectives significantly improved. Both students and faculty felt that the integration of geriatrics and palliative medicine was effective. Students valued the topic, appreciated the pedagogical approach and the relevance to clinical preparation, and identified opportunities for continued learning. Students' differential diagnoses demonstrated application of components of three of the four Ms in the 4Ms framework (mentation, medications, and mobility). Notably, many learners did not apply the fourth M (what matters most) to the case without prompting. Discussion: This curriculum was well received and effective and can be easily adapted for use with various levels of learners. Faculty should look for additional opportunities to integrate content into preexisting curricular structures.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.