Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39916991›Full record

ArticleJournal of medical imaging (Bellingham, Wash.)2025

Ultrasound elastic modulus reconstruction using a deep learning model trained with simulated data.

Utsav Ratna Tuladhar, Richard A Simon, Cristian A Linte, Michael S Richards

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of medical imaging (Bellingham, Wash.), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Utsav Ratna TuladharRochester Institute of Technology, Electrical and Computer Engineering, Rochester, New York, United States.
Richard A SimonRochester Institute of Technology, Biomedical Engineering, Rochester, New York, United States.
Cristian A LinteRochester Institute of Technology, Biomedical Engineering, Rochester, New York, United States.
Michael S RichardsRochester Institute of Technology, Biomedical Engineering, Rochester, New York, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3899-6109

Funding

Biomedical Computing and Visualization Tools for Computer-integrated Diagnostic and Therapeutic Data ScienceR35GM128877 · NIGMS · ROCHESTER INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY · PI Cristian A Linte · 2018 to 2026
$2.9M
NIGMS NIH HHS R35 GM128877
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Purpose: Ultrasound (US) elastography is a technique for non-invasive quantification of material properties, such as stiffness, from ultrasound images of deforming tissue. The material properties are calculated by solving the inverse problem on the measured displacement field from the ultrasound images. The limitations of traditional inverse problem techniques in US elastography are either slow and computationally intensive (iterative techniques) or sensitive to measurement noise and dependent on full displacement field data (direct techniques). Thus, we develop and validate a deep learning approach for solving the inverse problem in US elastography. This involves recovering the spatial modulus distribution of the elastic modulus from one component of the US-measured displacement field. Approach: We present a U-Net-based deep learning neural network to address the inverse problem in ultrasound elastography. This approach diverges from traditional methods by focusing on a data-driven model. The neural network is trained using data generated from a forward finite element model. This simulation incorporates variations in the displacement fields that correspond to the elastic modulus distribution, allowing the network to learn without the need for extensive real-world measurement data. The inverse problem of predicting the modulus spatial distribution from ultrasound-measured displacement fields is addressed using a trained neural network. The neural network is evaluated with mean squared error (MSE) and mean absolute percentage error (MAPE) metrics. To extend our model to practical purposes, we conduct phantom experiments and also apply our model to clinical data. Results: Our simulated results indicate that our deep learning (DL) model effectively reconstructs modulus distributions, as evidenced by low MSE and MAPE evaluation metrics. We obtain a mean MAPE of 0.32% for a hard inclusion and 0.39% for a soft inclusion. Similarly, in our phantom studies, the predicted modulus ratio aligns with the expected range, affirming the model's accuracy. These findings, alongside evaluations using the modulus ratio and contrast-to-noise ratio, confirm our DL model's robust generalization capabilities across diverse datasets. Conclusions: The presented work demonstrated that provided the simulated data are sufficiently diverse and representative of a wide variability, the algorithm trained on simulated data would generalize well to both phantom, as well as real-world clinical data.

Indexed as

deep learninginverse problemultrasound elastography

Identifiers

PMID39916991
PMCPMC11796470

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.