ArticleFrontiers in immunology2024
Feature selection enhances peptide binding predictions for TCR-specific interactions.
Article in Frontiers in immunology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Biophysical modeling for accurate T cell specificity prediction of viral and tumor antigens.Nature communications · 2026Article
- A biophysical framework for accurately identifying antigen single-amino acid escape variants and corresponding variant-specific compensatory TCR sequences.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026Article
- ProTCR: a protein language model-driven framework for decoding TCR-antigen recognition toward precision immunotherapies.Briefings in bioinformatics · 2026Article
- Structure guided design and molecular modelling of a novel peptide-SWCNT biosensor targeting NS1 dengue virus.RSC advances · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
- Update of
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Introduction: T-cell receptors (TCRs) play a critical role in the immune response by recognizing specific ligand peptides presented by major histocompatibility complex (MHC) molecules. Accurate prediction of peptide binding to TCRs is essential for advancing immunotherapy, vaccine design, and understanding mechanisms of autoimmune disorders. Methods: This study presents a theoretical approach that explores the impact of feature selection techniques on enhancing the predictive accuracy of peptide binding models tailored for specific TCRs. To evaluate our approach across different TCR systems, we utilized a dataset that includes peptide libraries tested against three distinct murine TCRs. A broad range of physicochemical properties, including amino acid composition, dipeptide composition, and tripeptide features, were integrated into the machine learning-based feature selection framework to identify key properties contributing to binding affinity. Results: Our analysis reveals that leveraging optimized feature subsets not only simplifies the model complexity but also enhances predictive performance, enabling more precise identification of TCR peptide interactions. The results of our feature selection method are consistent with findings from hybrid approaches that utilize both sequence and structural data as input as well as experimental data. Discussion: Our theoretical approach highlights the role of feature selection in peptide-TCR interactions, providing a quantitative tool for uncovering the molecular mechanisms of the T-cell response and assisting in the design of more advanced targeted therapeutics.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.