ArticleFrontiers in dental medicine2023
Regenerative endodontic procedures in immature permanent teeth with pulp necrosis: the impact of microbiology on clinical and radiographic outcome.
Article in Frontiers in dental medicine, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Distinct Microbiota and Functional Pathway Profiles Define Success and Failure in Regenerative Endodontic Treatment.International endodontic journal · 2026Observational
- Regenerative Endodontic Procedure in Mandibular First Molar: A Clinical Case Report.Clinical case reports · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Aims: The current study aimed to determine how the disinfection strategy for regenerative endodontic procedures (REPs) influences overall bacterial load and REP outcomes. Different bacterial species in the teeth were also examined in this study. Methods: A previously reported non-randomized controlled clinical research on REP ± leukocyte and platelet-rich fibrin gathered microbial samples from 14 of 29 patients during REP (LPRF). Four microbiological samples were obtained in two treatment sessions. S1 and S2 were taken before and after the first irrigation with 1.5% NaOCl and saline. Samples S3 and S4 were obtained before and after rinsing with 17% EDTA in the second treatment session. Microbial samples were identified using a quantitative polymerase chain reaction with species-specific primers. Results: The total bacterial load recovered from patients showed a significant ( Conclusion: The REP disinfection protocol of the present study seems to be satisfactorily effective in reducing the total bacterial load, omitting clinical symptoms and inducing periapical bone healing in immature permanent teeth with pulp necrosis. However, LPRF seems to prevent these outcomes from being achieved and should consequently therefore not be recommended in REPs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.