Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39916898›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in dental medicine2023

Parents' satisfaction and children's acceptance of nasal compared to oral midazolam for sedation in two consecutive pediatric dental treatments: a randomized controlled study.

Avia Fux-Noy, Qamar Saadi, Aviv Shmueli, Elinor Halperson, Diana Ram, Moti Moskovitz

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in dental medicine, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT02679781 (Nasal Versus Oral Midazolam Sedation in Routine Pediatric Dental Care), which is not on this map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT02679781 nacompletednot on this map

Nasal Versus Oral Midazolam Sedation in Routine Pediatric Dental Care

TypeinterventionalSponsorHadassah Medical OrganizationRan2017 to 2020Enrolled70ConditionsConscious SedationArmsoral midazolam, nasal midazolam
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Avia Fux-NoyDepartment of Pediatric Dentistry, Faculty of Dental Medicine, Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Israel, Hadassah Medical Center, Jerusalem, Israel.
Qamar SaadiDepartment of Pediatric Dentistry, Hadassah Medical Center, Jerusalem, Israel.
Aviv ShmueliDepartment of Pediatric Dentistry, Faculty of Dental Medicine, Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Israel, Hadassah Medical Center, Jerusalem, Israel.
Elinor HalpersonDepartment of Pediatric Dentistry, Faculty of Dental Medicine, Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Israel, Hadassah Medical Center, Jerusalem, Israel.
Diana RamDepartment of Pediatric Dentistry, Faculty of Dental Medicine, Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Israel, Hadassah Medical Center, Jerusalem, Israel.
Moti MoskovitzDepartment of Pediatric Dentistry, Faculty of Dental Medicine, Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Israel, Hadassah Medical Center, Jerusalem, Israel.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Midazolam, by either the oral or the nasal route, is safe and effective in reducing anxiety and improving behavior in children during dental procedures. Aim: To compare both children's acceptance and parents' satisfaction with midazolam premedication, when administered as an oral syrup or as a nasal spray and explore whether there were positive or negative changes in acceptance during consecutive dental treatment visits. Methods: Randomized controlled study among uncooperative 2-6-year-old children who needed at least two similar dental treatments. On each visit, the acceptability of the medication was assessed as good, fair, or poor. The duration of crying after medication administration was recorded. Additionally, parents were asked to rank their satisfaction with the mode of administration. Results: The study group included 60 children; 30 patients received midazolam orally and 30 nasally. Route of administration did not correlate with medication acceptance in the first ( Conclusions: Acceptance of premedication is expected to deteriorate after the first treatment visit, especially in the oral route of administration. Dentists should consider nasal spray administration for young pediatric patients who need more than one dental treatment. Parents should be prepared for possible resistance or refusal by children. Clinical Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov, identifier NCT02679781.

Indexed as

moderate sedationnasal midazolamoral midazolampediatric dental treatmentpremedication acceptance

Identifiers

PMID39916898
PMCPMC11797828

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.