Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39916891›Full record

ArticleJournal of new approaches in educational research2025

Improving reporting standards in quantitative educational intervention research: introducing the CLOSER and CIDER checklists.

Rebecca Upsher, Eleanor Dommett, Sophie Carlisle, Sarah Conner, Geraldene Codina, Anna Nobili, Nicola C Byrom

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of new approaches in educational research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Rebecca UpsherDepartment of Psychology, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neurosciences, King's College London, London, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-0881-8654
Eleanor DommettDepartment of Psychology, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neurosciences, King's College London, London, UK.
Sophie CarlisleHealth Service and Population Research, King's College London, London, UK.
Sarah ConnerTransforming Assess and Student Outcomes in Higher Education, London, UK.
Geraldene CodinaInstitute of Education, University of Derby, Derby, UK.
Anna NobiliStudent Wellbeing Support, University of Derby, Derby, UK.
Nicola C ByromDepartment of Psychology, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neurosciences, King's College London, London, UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In educational research, the complexity of interventions and the diversity of contexts challenge the adequacy of existing reporting standards, primarily tailored for health interventions and randomised controlled trials. Recognising the critical need for appropriate tools to support education research, we developed two checklists: the CheckList Of Standards of reporting in Education Research (CLOSER) and the Checklist for Intervention Description of Education Research (CIDER). CLOSER was designed to guide the comprehensive reporting of quantitative educational intervention research from the abstract to the discussion for multiple study designs. Concurrently, CIDER details the precise features of educational interventions. The final refinements of CLOSER and CIDER comprise of 34 and 17 items, respectively, developed through a five-stage process, including tool adaptation, expert feedback, a 2-round modified Delphi consensus survey, and final refinements. These checklists aim to enhance the clarity of educational intervention research findings, facilitating their replicability and subsequent meaningful translation into practice and policy. This addresses the gap in educational research reporting standards and sets the stage for a more robust, evidence-informed approach to educational intervention development and evaluation. Supplementary Information: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s44322-024-00022-9.

Indexed as

Checklist developmentEducational interventionsEvidence-informed practiceQuantitative researchReporting standardsResearch methodology

Identifiers

PMID39916891
PMCPMC11801185

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.