ArticleHeliyon2025
Productivity improvement through lean tools in cement industry - A case study.
Article in Heliyon, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Cement is a vital commodity that accelerates economic growth and infrastructure development, compelling manufacturers to enhance productivity. Lean is a philosophy of increasing productivity while reducing waste and production losses in a manufacturing process. Many organizations benefit from lean adoption by increasing their productivity and efficiency. This study aims to examine the current production system of a cement industry where lean tools are underutilized and explores the potential for applying these tools to improve productivity. The current Overall Equipment Effectiveness (OEE) of the industry is almost 65.60 %, significantly below the world-class benchmark of 85 %. The study aims to identify the main causes of production loss or low OEE, including motor damage, bearing damage, vibration, and lack of 5S practice. It also tries to identify certain areas for improvement and makes recommendations on how to enhance them. Total Productive Maintenance (TPM) and 5S were used to decrease equipment failures and breakdowns, which resulted in an increase in OEE up to 68 %. These findings offer valuable insights for decision-makers to address root causes and enhance productivity.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.