ArticleSensing and Bio-Sensing Research2024
Printing technologies for the fabrication of ion-selective electrodes.
Article in Sensing and Bio-Sensing Research, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Flexible Sensing Electrodes: From Materials Design to Device Fabrication.Materials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Nanomaterial-Based Inkjet Printing for Electrochemical Sensing.Small (Weinheim an der Bergstrasse, Germany) · 2026Review
- Insulin Quantification Through Electrochemical and Optical Aptasensors: A Review.Annals of biomedical engineering · 2025Review
- Ion-selective electrodes: innovations for precision in vivo plant ion monitoring.Mikrochimica acta · 2025Review
- Comparative Study of Potassium Ion-Selective Electrodes with Solid Contact: Impact of Intermediate Layer Material on Temperature Resistance.Molecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The fabrication of ion-selective electrodes (ISEs) via printing technologies such as screen-printing, inkjet printing, and 3D printing is attracting increasing attention due to the superb reproducibility and scalability of these technologies. In contrast to traditional manual casting, coating, and assembling procedures often used in research labs, printing methods are much more compatible with manufacturing processes in industry and, therefore, are easier to scale up. In this paper, we first summarized and compared the printing mechanisms and ink requirements of screen printing, inkjet printing, and 3D printing technologies. Then we present an overview of how different printing technologies can create sensor components, such as electrical contact layers, ion-to-electron transduction layers, ion sensing membranes, reference electrode membranes, insulation layers, and microfluidic/detection housings. The printing protocol, ink material, and sensor performance are highlighted for a few selected ISEs. This review concludes with a summary of the advantages and drawbacks of various printing technologies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.