ReviewEuropean journal of anaesthesiology and intensive care2023
Acquired factor XIII deficiency: A scoping review.
Review in European journal of anaesthesiology and intensive care, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- Acquired Autoimmune Factor XIII Deficiency as a Novel Immune-Related Adverse Event of Combined Ipilimumab and Nivolumab Therapy for Renal Cell Carcinoma: A Case Report.IJU case reports · 2026Article
- Human Transglutaminases: Updated Insights into Activation Mechanisms, Allosteric Regulation and Disease.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Review
- Factor XIII Deficiency: A Silent Bleeder Behind a Normal Coagulation Profile.Clinical case reports · 2026Article
- Factor XIII deficiency: an updated approach to diagnosis and management.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Review
- Factor XIII Deficiency: A Review of Biology, Testing, and Treatment.Clinical hematology international · 2026Review
- Acquired factor XIII deficiency in adult patients during ECMO: a prospective observational study.Scientific reports · 2025Observational
- Recurrent Intracerebral Hemorrhage in a 30-Year-Old Male With Factor XIII Deficiency: A Case Report.Case reports in hematology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Acquired factor XIII (FXIII) deficiency is a very rare haemostatic defect that can be either immune (rare development of an autoantibody targeting FXIII epitopes) or nonimmune (diminished synthesis or increased consumption of the same factor). The aim of this study is to review the symptomatology, the diagnostic method used, but above all to determine the most frequently used and potentially most effective treatment for acquired FXIII deficiency. PubMed, Medline, embase/Ovid databases were queried from 1 January 2012 to 3 April 2022. Data extraction was performed using the keywords 'Acquired FXIII deficiency.' The systematic search identified 474 records. After screening titles and abstracts, only 36 articles met the eligibility criteria. The mean age of all patients was 57.6 [range, 1-84] years. The male to female ratio was 35 : 25. The majority of cases described were due an autoimmune reaction with antibody production (24 manuscripts), only six manuscripts described consumption. The most prevalent symptoms were local haematoma (31). Six cases died, two from haemorrhagic shock, two from haemorrhagic stroke, one from respiratory distress, and 1 from septic shock. Given the patient outcomes, this review confirms that the most appropriate treatment consists of one of the following elements or a combination of several of these elements: FXIII concentrate, corticosteroids, cyclophosphamide, rituximab for autoimmune cases, and FXIII concentrate supplementation only in case of consumption.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.