Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39916786›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in psychology2024

Psychological, psychiatric, and behavioral sciences measurement scales: best practice guidelines for their development and validation.

Alberto Stefana, Stefano Damiani, Umberto Granziol, Umberto Provenzani, Marco Solmi, Eric A Youngstrom, Paolo Fusar-Poli

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in psychology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 53 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
53citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

53 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Initial Psychometric Evaluation of the Inventory of Parent and Peer Attachment in Greek Adolescents.European journal of investigation in health, psychology and education · 2026
    Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. The Development of the Psychological Monitors' Burnout Scale in College.Behavioral sciences (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Measurement-Based Care Benchmarks and Bipolar Classification in ABCD Youth.medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences · 2026
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Stable structure, shifting links: How depression-anxiety symptom networks reconfigure from pregnancy to postpartum.European psychiatry : the journal of the Association of European Psychiatrists · 2026
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Alberto StefanaDepartment of Brain and Behavioral Sciences, University of Pavia, Pavia, Italy.
Stefano DamianiDepartment of Brain and Behavioral Sciences, University of Pavia, Pavia, Italy.
Umberto GranziolDepartment of General Psychology, University of Padua, Padua, Italy.
Umberto ProvenzaniDepartment of Brain and Behavioral Sciences, University of Pavia, Pavia, Italy.
Marco SolmiSCIENCES Lab, Department of Psychiatry, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, ON, Canada.
Eric A Youngstrom *Division of Child and Family Psychiatry, Institute for Mental and Behavioral Health Research, Nationwide Children's Hospital, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, United States.
Paolo Fusar-Poli *Department of Brain and Behavioral Sciences, University of Pavia, Pavia, Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Psychiatric, psychological, and behavioral sciences scales provide quantitative representations of phenomena such as emotions, beliefs, functioning, and social role perceptions. Methodologists and researchers have criticized current scale development practices, emphasizing that inaccurate measurements can derail theory development and clinical decisions, thereby impeding progress in mental health research and practice. These shortcomings often stem from a lack of understanding of appropriate scale development techniques. This article presents a guide to scope, organize, and clarify the process of scale development and validation for psychological and psychiatric use by integrating current methodological literature with the authors' real-world experience. The process is divided into five phases comprising 18 steps. In the Preliminary Phase, the need for a new scale is assessed, including a review of existing measures. In the Item Development Phase, the construct is defined, and an initial pool of items is generated, incorporating literature reviews, expert feedback, and target population evaluation to ensure item relevance and clarity. During the Scale Construction Phase, the scale is finalized through the administration of surveys to a large sample, followed by parallel analysis, exploratory factor, and item descriptive statistics to identify functional items. In the Scale Evaluation Phase, the dimensionality, reliability, and validity of the scale are rigorously tested using both classical and modern psychometric techniques. Finally, in the Finalization Phase, the optimal item sequence is decided, and a comprehensive inventory manual is prepared. In sum, this structured approach provides researchers and clinicians with a comprehensive methodology for developing reliable, valid, and user-friendly psychological, psychiatric, and behavioral sciences measurement scales.

Indexed as

evidence-based assessmentpsychiatric measurementpsychological measurementscale developmentscale validation

Identifiers

PMID39916786
PMCPMC11798685

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.