ArticleJournal of clinical imaging science2025
Aortomesenteric angle: A contrast-enhanced computed tomography analysis of respiratory phase and visceral fat impact.
Article in Journal of clinical imaging science, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objectives: The objective of this study was to evaluate the relationship between the aortomesenteric angle at end-inspiration and end-expiration and its variation rate with several anthropometric parameters. Material and Methods: Sagittal reconstructed computed tomography (CT) images of 59 patients who underwent contrast-enhanced CT at end-inspiration and end-expiration between 2015 and 2020 were reviewed. All these patients underwent dynamic contrast CT during both inspiration and expiration for adrenal venous sampling purposes. Two experienced radiologists measured the aortomesenteric angle during both end-inspiration and end-expiration, and its variation rate. Pearson's or Spearman's correlation analysis was used to assess correlations between the angle or variation rate and height, weight, body mass index (BMI), visceral fat, subcutaneous fat, and diaphragm motion. Results: The aortomesenteric angle was significantly larger at end-expiration (88.65 ± 25.15, 95% confidence interval [CI] 82.09-95.20) compared to end-inspiration (62.22 ± 21.90, 95% CI 56.51-67.93, Conclusion: The aortomesenteric angle at end-expiration was significantly larger than at end-inspiration, with the strongest correlation found between the angle and visceral fat.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.