Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39916759›Full record

ArticleEuropean journal of anaesthesiology and intensive care2023

Haemodynamic monitoring and management in patients having noncardiac surgery: A survey among members of the European Society of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care.

Moritz Flick, Alexandre Joosten, Thomas W L Scheeren, Jacques Duranteau, Bernd Saugel

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in European journal of anaesthesiology and intensive care, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06123039 (Use of Heart-lung Interaction Parameters to Predict Haemodynamic Tolerance to the Open Lung Approach With Individualised PEEP During Invasive Mechanical Ventilation in the Operating Room), which is not on this map. Cited by 14 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06123039 completednot on this map

Use of Heart-lung Interaction Parameters to Predict Haemodynamic Tolerance to the Open Lung Approach With Individualised PEEP During Invasive Mechanical Ventilation in the Operating Room

TypeobservationalSponsorHospital Universitario La FeRan2023 to 2025Enrolled72ConditionsAnesthesia, Perioperative/Postoperative Complications, Hypovolemia, Haemodynamic InstabilityArmsTidal Volume Challenge, Recruitment maneuver obtaining individualised PEEP
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Haemodynamic monitoring during noncardiac surgery: past, present, and future.Journal of clinical monitoring and computing · 2024
    Review
  14. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Moritz FlickFrom the Department of Anesthesiology, Center of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany (MF, BS), Department of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care, Université Paris-Sud, Paul Brousse Hospital, Assistance Publique Hôpitaux de Paris (APHP), Villejuif, France (AJ), Department of Anaesthesiology, University Medical Centre Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands (TWLS), Department of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care, Assistance Publique Hôpitaux de Paris, Paris-Saclay University, Bicetre Hospital, Paris (JD) and Outcomes Research Consortium, Cleveland, Ohio, USA (BS).
Alexandre JoostenFrom the Department of Anesthesiology, Center of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany (MF, BS), Department of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care, Université Paris-Sud, Paul Brousse Hospital, Assistance Publique Hôpitaux de Paris (APHP), Villejuif, France (AJ), Department of Anaesthesiology, University Medical Centre Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands (TWLS), Department of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care, Assistance Publique Hôpitaux de Paris, Paris-Saclay University, Bicetre Hospital, Paris (JD) and Outcomes Research Consortium, Cleveland, Ohio, USA (BS).
Thomas W L ScheerenFrom the Department of Anesthesiology, Center of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany (MF, BS), Department of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care, Université Paris-Sud, Paul Brousse Hospital, Assistance Publique Hôpitaux de Paris (APHP), Villejuif, France (AJ), Department of Anaesthesiology, University Medical Centre Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands (TWLS), Department of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care, Assistance Publique Hôpitaux de Paris, Paris-Saclay University, Bicetre Hospital, Paris (JD) and Outcomes Research Consortium, Cleveland, Ohio, USA (BS).
Jacques DuranteauFrom the Department of Anesthesiology, Center of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany (MF, BS), Department of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care, Université Paris-Sud, Paul Brousse Hospital, Assistance Publique Hôpitaux de Paris (APHP), Villejuif, France (AJ), Department of Anaesthesiology, University Medical Centre Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands (TWLS), Department of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care, Assistance Publique Hôpitaux de Paris, Paris-Saclay University, Bicetre Hospital, Paris (JD) and Outcomes Research Consortium, Cleveland, Ohio, USA (BS).
Bernd SaugelFrom the Department of Anesthesiology, Center of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany (MF, BS), Department of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care, Université Paris-Sud, Paul Brousse Hospital, Assistance Publique Hôpitaux de Paris (APHP), Villejuif, France (AJ), Department of Anaesthesiology, University Medical Centre Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands (TWLS), Department of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care, Assistance Publique Hôpitaux de Paris, Paris-Saclay University, Bicetre Hospital, Paris (JD) and Outcomes Research Consortium, Cleveland, Ohio, USA (BS).

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundHaemodynamic monitoring and management is a mainstay of peri-operative anaesthetic care.

objectiveTo determine how anaesthesiologists measure and manage blood pressure and cardiac output, and how they guide fluid administration and assess fluid responsiveness in patients having noncardiac surgery.

designWeb-based survey.

settingSurvey among members of the European Society of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care (ESAIC) in October and November 2021.

participantsESAIC members responding to the survey.

main outcome measuresRespondents' answers to 30 questions on haemodynamic monitoring and management, and fluid therapy.

resultsA total of 615 fully completed surveys were analysed. Arterial catheters are usually not placed before induction of general anaesthesia (378/615; 61%) even when invasive blood pressure monitoring is planned. Mean arterial pressure (532/615; 87%) with lower intervention thresholds of 65 mmHg (183/531; 34%) or 20% below pre-operative baseline (166/531; 31%) is primarily used to guide blood pressure management. Cardiac output is most frequently measured using pulse wave analysis (548/597; 92%). However, only one-third of respondents (almost) always use cardiac output to guide haemodynamic management in high-risk patients (225/582; 39%). Dynamic cardiac preload variables are more frequently used to guide haemodynamic management than cardiac output [pulse pressure variation (almost) always: 318/589; 54%]. Standardised treatment protocols are rarely used for haemodynamic management (139/614; 23%). For fluid therapy, crystalloids are primarily used as maintenance fluids, to treat hypovolaemia, and for fluid challenges. The use of 0.9% saline and hydroxyethyl starch has declined over the last decade. The preferred methods to assess fluid responsiveness are dynamic preload variables and fluid challenges, most commonly with 250 ml of fluid (319/613; 52%).

conclusionThis survey provides important information how anaesthesiologists currently measure and manage blood pressure and cardiac output, and how they guide fluid administration in patients having noncardiac surgery.

Identifiers

PMID39916759
PMCPMC11783660

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.