Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39916749›Full record

ArticleMedical research archives2024

Osteosarcoma: A comprehensive review of model systems and experimental therapies.

Gabrielle M Robbins, Young Y Vue, Eric P Rahrmann, Branden S Moriarity

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Medical research archives, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. CXCL10-induced chemotaxis ofMolecular therapy. Oncology · 2025
    Article
  6. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Gabrielle M RobbinsDepartment of Pediatrics, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN 55455, USA.
Young Y VueDepartment of Pediatrics, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN 55455, USA.
Eric P RahrmannThe Hormel Institute, University of Minnesota, Austin, MN 55912, USA.
Branden S MoriarityDepartment of Pediatrics, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN 55455, USA.

Funding

Women's CancerP30CA077598 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA TWIN CITIES · PI Timothy C. Hallstrom · 1998 to 2026
$100.4M
Use of microfluidic tumor cultures to enable clinical trials of therapies for ovarian cancerP50CA136393 · NCI · MAYO CLINIC ROCHESTER · PI SCOTT H KAUFMANN · 2009 to 2026
$37.0M
Project 4:Targeting M2-like Macrophages and MDSC with Myelolytic-VirotherapyU54CA232561 · NCI · RESEARCH INST NATIONWIDE CHILDREN'S HOSP · PI CAIRO, MITCHELL S., CRIPE, TIMOTHY P · 2019 to 2023
$12.1M
Project 3P01CA254849 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA · PI ODDE, DAVID J. · 2021 to 2025
$9.4M
TECH CoreU54CA268069 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA · PI David J. Odde · 2022 to 2026
$8.2M
SCGE Disease Models Studies Supplement: Evaluation of prime editing for the amelioration of alpha-1-antitrypsin deficiency in murine and porcine models.U24OD026641 · OD · RECOMBINETICS, INC. · PI CARLSON, DANIEL FRED · 2018 to 2022
$4.1M
Activated NK CAR Cells to Cure HIVR01AI161017 · NIAID · UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA · PI MORIARITY, BRANDEN S, SKINNER, PAMELA J · 2021 to 2025
$3.8M
Engineered B Cells as a Universal Platform for the Treatment of EnzymopathiesR01AI146009 · NIAID · UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA · PI MORIARITY, BRANDEN S · 2020 to 2024
$1.9M
Genome Engineered Natural Killer Cell Immunotherapy against Human OsteosarcomaF30OD030021 · OD · UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA · PI ROBBINS, GABRIELLE MATILDE · 2021 to 2024
$163k
NCI NIH HHS P01 CA254849NCI NIH HHS P30 CA077598NCI NIH HHS P50 CA136393NCI NIH HHS U54 CA232561NCI NIH HHS U54 CA268069NIAID NIH HHS R01 AI146009NIAID NIH HHS R01 AI161017NIH HHS F30 OD030021NIH HHS U24 OD026641
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Osteosarcoma (OSA) is a highly malignant bone tumor for which more than 50% of patients have or will develop metastatic disease, resulting in an abysmal 5-year survival rate of <29%. Despite the advances in science and medicine, the etiology of OSA remains unclear. Similarly, the standard of care (surgery and chemotherapy) has changed little in the past 5 decades. This stagnation in treatment options is in part due to inadequate preclinical models for OSA; many of these models are oversimplified and do not account for the complexities of patient disease. Further, current treatments are harsh and invasive (e.g. high dose chemotherapy and potential limb removal) leading to a reduction in a patient's quality of life (e.g. hearing loss, infertility, neuropathy), highlighting a need for developing more effective treatment strategies. Many experimental therapies have been tested in the preclinical and preclinical setting, with varying degrees of success. In this review, we will focus on pediatric and adolescent OSA, highlighting current animal models and experimental therapies.

Identifiers

PMID39916749
PMCPMC11801376

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.