Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39916737›Full record

ArticleJournal of clinical orthopaedics and trauma2025

Changes in orthopaedic prescribing patterns of gabapentin associated with state prescribing restrictions: A large database study.

Maura R Guyler, Christian J Hecht, Joshua R Porto, Atul F Kamath

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of clinical orthopaedics and trauma, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Geographic Variation of Gabapentinoids and Opioids in US Nursing Homes.Journal of the American Medical Directors Association · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Maura R GuylerCase Western Reserve University School of Medicine, Cleveland, OH, USA.
Christian J HechtCase Western Reserve University School of Medicine, Cleveland, OH, USA.
Joshua R PortoCase Western Reserve University School of Medicine, Cleveland, OH, USA.
Atul F KamathCase Western Reserve University School of Medicine, Cleveland, OH, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Safety concerns have emerged regarding gabapentin, and as a result several states have recently adopted regulations for prescribing gabapentin. As gabapentin has been commonly used off-label for pain management in orthopedics, a retrospective analysis was conducted to investigate trends in orthopedic prescriptions of gabapentin considering novel state regulations. Methods: The study analyzed gabapentin prescription patterns of orthopedic surgeons from 2013 to 2021 recorded in annual Medicare Part D Public Use Files across the fifty states and Washington DC. Datasets were filtered to only include orthopedic providers. Gabapentin prescriptions were grouped based on state of practice for each surgeon per year for total gabapentin claims, supply in days, and beneficiaries. Twelve states classified gabapentin as a Schedule V drug, seven instituted a Prescription Drug Monitoring Program (PDMP), and 32 had no restrictions. States were grouped by prescription restriction type. Two-tailed t-tests were conducted to compare the annual average percent of change for gabapentin claims, supply, and beneficiaries per state following regulation. Results: Following regulation, the general trend of gabapentin claims, beneficiaries, and supply was a blunting in the annual rate of change. States with PDMPs for gabapentin had the lowest overall claims, supply, and beneficiaries. States with no regulation eclipsed states with Schedule V classifications for the most beneficiaries and supply in 2019 and claims in 2020. Six of 11 PDMP states had significant reductions across gabapentin claims, beneficiaries, and supply following regulation, compared to three of seven Schedule V states. Conclusion: The impact that state-based regulations had on gabapentin claims, supply, and beneficiaries was variable, likely due to different requirements in the enactment of their novel PDMP or Schedule V classifications. To optimize the implementation of these regulatory programs, public health authorities may adopt regulatory strategies that resemble those from states that were more effective in regulating gabapentin prescriptions. Level of evidence: Level III, Therapeutic Study.

Indexed as

GabapentinMedicareOrthopedicsPain managementPrescription drug monitoring programs

Identifiers

PMID39916737
PMCPMC11795135

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.